When an author tries to prove that written history is a lie by showing...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ancalimon
  • Start date Start date
A

Ancalimon

Guest
...evidence, why is he still discredited? archeological, linguistic, cultures evidence, etc...

is it because changing the status-quo of history would have devastating effects in current World politics?
What if the rules are there to keep us down and we need to break a few rules to reach the truth?
But what if truth is so devastating that religion, race and culture suddenly mean much different things in the eyes of the humans.

Such that humans unite and evolve to a new age.

What if politicians or religious leaders made it so they turned people into a crowd and than a herd. And without knowing, the herd defends the fake history against their own advantage?
aida: What if for example the diaries of people who were burned by the inquisition were confiscated and hidden by the Pope? There is no written evidence but there are archeological evidence of some people who once lived in Europe? For example Etruscans whose language can not be traced back to any nearby civilization. A man reads it, and shows how he did it with many evidence, but he is discredited and his name is not even mentioned to public. Why would this happen?
 
Back
Top