What's wrong with protecting a private businesses rights?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BobBarkersSoup
  • Start date Start date
that's not what i believe at all. that's what you fabricated in your head because you are incapable of a logical discussion.
 
You're right. Hospitals should have the right to refuse to revive a dying black man. RAND PAUL 2012
 
No one is asking how it is you dipshit, we're asking how you can support the concept of private business yet not agree they should have the right to decide who they do business with.

Hows this, what if I choose to give out food to needy people, but I only choose to give it out to white people. Should the government step in, or have a duty to step in and say I need to give some to needy people of other races? Obviously not, if you say yes, then you're fucking retarded. Okay, so if they shouldn't step in there, why is it suddenly justified for them to step in if I charge people money for the food I'm distributing?

Cliffs: you don't believe in private business, you believe in government controlled business.
 
wtf.


Ozmar: "IT'S NOT OK TO DISCRIMINATE!!! unless it's a group I don't care about, then it's fine."
 
Someone having a right to choose who has access to their property, goods, and/or services sure is a misguided principle!
 
Liberals want to create the world in their image and make everyone conform to it. Libertarians want to let people make the world on their own of their own merits.
 
this may be the third time I've asked if it hurts to be as stupid as you. please answer.



not letting you in my store does not injure you. murdering you does. jesus fuck you're dumb.
 
Just because I believe it should be the right of someone to turn business away doesn't mean that they will do it.

The want of money > People's personal beliefs
 
Not hiring the person would be equally discriminatory, would it not? Churches also have tax exempt status, supposedly because they operate for the public good. Using the same pro-regulation logic, shouldn't we regulate that even more than for profit businesses?
 
If prohibiting a business from racially or religiously discriminating against potential customers is a restriction of a right, I think it's a very light one that can prevent serious problems. I'd liken it to being required to wear a seatbelt, or requiring restaurants to keep a fire extinguisher in their kitchens.

Do you think that it constitutes an undue burden on businesses?
 
Coming from you that's

I wonder how many questions you have dodged or deflected throughout this thread
 
How about the mormon family that has lived in the same house in Oklahoma for 30 years and has to move because they can no longer get some essential service (for example, kidney dialysis)?
 
Back
Top