What's more moral - protecting one group against another's attacks, or commanding them

to commit genocide? Say you're a god and one group of people (who of course behaves in the exact way you knew they would when you created them in that exact way) periodically tries to attack members of another group.

Which course of action is more moral, and why?

1. Prevent members of the first group to harm the second.

2. Command members of the second group to commit genocide, killing all members in the first group, including women and children.
 
Back
Top