What would be the most believable and acceptable pretext for military action against

[Lucky]

North Korea? The Hitler Pretext: We were attacked first. Poland is invaded after Germany alleges it was attacked by Poland in 1939 after staging false attacks.

The Gulf of Tonkin Pretext; President Johnson escalates the war in Vietnam after alleging attacks by Vietnam against the US Navy in the gulf of Tonkin 1964.

The Bosnian Pretext: Clinton intervenes in civil war to support NATO allies.

The Weapons of Mass Destruction Pretext (aka preemptive war): Bush invaded Iraq 2003 based on UN resolutions.

The Totality of Threat pretext: We believed you when you said you were going to attack us so we attacked first. (a version of preemptive war) aka Hillary Clinton version.

 

[zapata]

the chinese shoulda sent in their folks & tanks in 89 june,steada shootin folks at tienneman square,,,,,,clowny kim dong dungh ill starved 2.5 million of his korean people in 93-95,,,,an unbalanced goof like kim or his sons,who caused this starvation,,,,show themselves unstable,nuts,and unpredictable,,,,,,people like this cannot be trusted with 110 lbs of bomb quality plutonium,,,this would make 5 or 6 bombs capable of destroying seoul,seattle,la,anchorage,san diego,san francisco,or maybe shanghai,,someone looking at kim as a temperamantal weenager whom you deal with by ignoring their tirades and "needs for attention",,,,,,is not dealing with a full deck