What would be the logical outcome of a restraining order hearing in family court in

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mystery Groper
  • Start date Start date
M

Mystery Groper

Guest
Pennsylvania? A woman and a man live together for just under three years. They have a child together, a toddler. The man owns the home they live in, and all bills are in his name. The man breaks the relationship off with the woman and asks how much time the woman needs to move out. She leaves the house, leaving all her belongings and that of her other children in the man's house, and refuses to tell the man where she is keeping the child they share together. She files for a restraining order accusing the man of being abusive to her and her children, though there is no evidence of said abuse. The restraining order evicts the man from his property until the hearing and allows the woman to stay there. The man's oldest child, from a previous relationship, also lives in the house. The woman has not stayed in the house since she left originally but has come and harassed the man's other child. Although the woman owns her own home at another location but is being rented out, her failure to stay at the man's property proves she has other housing at another address. What would be the logical outcome, according to Pennsylvania, at the hearing?
The man and woman were never married.
 
Back
Top