In article ,
Janet wrote:
Yes, German and English. I'd be curious what their word is.
However, again, being replaced by something does not mean that it was
co-opted. Pascha was celebrated long before even the Venerable Bede,
much as I love him. If you want to claim that the celebration of
"Easter" is a Christianization of Oestre, then you have to impute a much
greater influence of the Anglo-Saxons and Jutes than history has
assigned them. Bede was writing in mostly the 8th century, however, the
Crucifixion happened in the first century and is MOST CERTAINLY
CONNECTED BOTH IN TIME AND THEOLOGICALLY TO THE PASSOVER. Christ our
Passover is sacrificed for us. That was written in the first century.
The commemoration of this particular Passover began in the first
century. Passover is in spring, usually March or April according to our
calendar. The Council of Nicaea in roughly 325, among other things,
also officially set the method for calculating the date for "Easter"
based on their understanding of the Jewish calendar and the Julian
calendar. Nearly every other language aside from English and other
Germanic tongues do not use the term Easter. You are insisting on a
paganization that was by no means universal and came after the holiday
was commemorated, both unofficially and officially. You English might
have syncretized Oestre, but that was not the practice of the entire
Church.
Regards,
Ranee @ Arabian Knits
"She seeks wool and flax, and works with willing hands." Prov 31:13
http://arabianknits.blogspot.com/