What did everyone think of Saw 3D *Spoilers Alert!*

Why would someone who is a staff member at some random cinema know something like that? He'll just be guessing like the rest of us.
 
I think the post credits scene was a bridge to why FBI agents Perez and Erickson are suspicious of Hoffman.It would have been better placed in the movie.

Also,I feel it was silly bringing in new detective characters when they could have replaced Gibson with the underused Detective Fisk.A welcome flashback could have involved Evan and his gang assisting Hoffman in abducting the victims of V and VI,presumingly because of evidence he has on them.

The other 2 pigmask people should have taken off their masks to reveal the survivors of the opening trap.That would give that trap a reason within the context of the movie.
 
Thank you for that. I'm not great at figuring out timelines in general :) Still love the films though.



A guy at Odeon told me they had been offered an 8th if part 7 was successful, I told you what had happened, If he was right or wrong, I don't know. I just reported on what happened.

Personally, I would love an 8th though!
 
I haven't seen any of the others but I went to see this last week and I thought it was a decent bit of escapism; a good "Friday night" type of film. The storyline was quite decent for a cut and slash horror, and although the 3D aspect wasn't quite what I was expecting, it complimented the action fairly well. All in all I thought it was a worthy watch.
 
jamespondo said:
I think the post credits scene was a bridge to why FBI agents Perez and Erickson are suspicious of Hoffman.It would have been better placed in the movie.

Also,I feel it was silly bringing in new detective characters when they could have replaced Gibson with the underused Detective Fisk.A welcome flashback could have involved Evan and his gang assisting Hoffman in abducting the victims of V and VI,presumingly because of evidence he has on them.

The other 2 pigmask people should have taken off their masks to reveal the survivors of the opening trap.That would give that trap a reason within the context of the movie.[/QUOTE]

I quite like that idea, it seems that alot of viewers are unsatisfied that the identity of the other 2 pig mask wearers wasn't disclosed.
Click to expand...
 
I watched the Saw films up until number 5. After that, i pretty much lost the will.

However i am still intrigued as to what has gone on in Saw 6 and 7. Can anybody film me in please on what i've missed? Spoilers galore would be preferred, as i don't intend on watching them anytime soon.

Especially the whole bringing back Lawrence Gordon thing. I wanted him back in the 2nd one, however the fact that they've brought him back now seems a bit too late.

They should've left it after the first film...
 
Thank you. That's saved me from wasting a couple of hours I wouldn't get back!

Quite frankly, they sound absolutely awful. Such a poor way to utilise the return of Lawrence Gordon. And how many accomplices does Jigsaw need?

Honestly, does anybody still enjoy the Saw films? Or do you keep watching to know how it enRAB? I still remember watching the first film at the cinema and it was one of my favourite films. But these shoddy, ridiculous sequels have ruined it completely. What worries me is that despite them claiming this is "the last ever Saw film", I doubt it will be.
 
I watched this yesterday & was my first time watching a 3D film at the cinema. I thought that it was a good way to finish the film & will buy it when it gets released on DVD.

With the first trap..........
Cleavage in 3D isn't a bad thing either
:D
 
Back
Top