Website name and do you prefer flash or reg css?

K

kcoria91

New member
I kind of have to create (dont ask why lol) a website for myself and i was wondering, should i just use my name for the website? (name is Kevin coria) or should i do what i wanted to do the first time? (invovle a word i like with my initials like: ambitious-kc.com)

Oh and i wanted to make the site orgi. in css as i thought i would be easier but what if i do it in flash? what are the pro's and cons to it?
 
Web site domains are available on a first-come, first-served basis. Pick one that you like, and buy it right away, if it's available.

As for which to use, I say go for the CSS. The reason? Not everyone has or wants Flash on their computer. For example, I have a netbook, and running Flash adds to my very limited disk space, and my CPU isn't high-powered enough to run Flash well.

I pass over Flash-heavy sites as a result.

CSS is implemented at the server side, and every browser just needs to know how to render the code it receives. It's far more user-friendly than Flash.

Web sites are all about content. You can have a lot of glitz (Flash), and say nothing. With CSS, you still need to say something.
 
Web site domains are available on a first-come, first-served basis. Pick one that you like, and buy it right away, if it's available.

As for which to use, I say go for the CSS. The reason? Not everyone has or wants Flash on their computer. For example, I have a netbook, and running Flash adds to my very limited disk space, and my CPU isn't high-powered enough to run Flash well.

I pass over Flash-heavy sites as a result.

CSS is implemented at the server side, and every browser just needs to know how to render the code it receives. It's far more user-friendly than Flash.

Web sites are all about content. You can have a lot of glitz (Flash), and say nothing. With CSS, you still need to say something.
 
Web site domains are available on a first-come, first-served basis. Pick one that you like, and buy it right away, if it's available.

As for which to use, I say go for the CSS. The reason? Not everyone has or wants Flash on their computer. For example, I have a netbook, and running Flash adds to my very limited disk space, and my CPU isn't high-powered enough to run Flash well.

I pass over Flash-heavy sites as a result.

CSS is implemented at the server side, and every browser just needs to know how to render the code it receives. It's far more user-friendly than Flash.

Web sites are all about content. You can have a lot of glitz (Flash), and say nothing. With CSS, you still need to say something.
 
Web site domains are available on a first-come, first-served basis. Pick one that you like, and buy it right away, if it's available.

As for which to use, I say go for the CSS. The reason? Not everyone has or wants Flash on their computer. For example, I have a netbook, and running Flash adds to my very limited disk space, and my CPU isn't high-powered enough to run Flash well.

I pass over Flash-heavy sites as a result.

CSS is implemented at the server side, and every browser just needs to know how to render the code it receives. It's far more user-friendly than Flash.

Web sites are all about content. You can have a lot of glitz (Flash), and say nothing. With CSS, you still need to say something.
 
Web site domains are available on a first-come, first-served basis. Pick one that you like, and buy it right away, if it's available.

As for which to use, I say go for the CSS. The reason? Not everyone has or wants Flash on their computer. For example, I have a netbook, and running Flash adds to my very limited disk space, and my CPU isn't high-powered enough to run Flash well.

I pass over Flash-heavy sites as a result.

CSS is implemented at the server side, and every browser just needs to know how to render the code it receives. It's far more user-friendly than Flash.

Web sites are all about content. You can have a lot of glitz (Flash), and say nothing. With CSS, you still need to say something.
 
Web site domains are available on a first-come, first-served basis. Pick one that you like, and buy it right away, if it's available.

As for which to use, I say go for the CSS. The reason? Not everyone has or wants Flash on their computer. For example, I have a netbook, and running Flash adds to my very limited disk space, and my CPU isn't high-powered enough to run Flash well.

I pass over Flash-heavy sites as a result.

CSS is implemented at the server side, and every browser just needs to know how to render the code it receives. It's far more user-friendly than Flash.

Web sites are all about content. You can have a lot of glitz (Flash), and say nothing. With CSS, you still need to say something.
 
Web site domains are available on a first-come, first-served basis. Pick one that you like, and buy it right away, if it's available.

As for which to use, I say go for the CSS. The reason? Not everyone has or wants Flash on their computer. For example, I have a netbook, and running Flash adds to my very limited disk space, and my CPU isn't high-powered enough to run Flash well.

I pass over Flash-heavy sites as a result.

CSS is implemented at the server side, and every browser just needs to know how to render the code it receives. It's far more user-friendly than Flash.

Web sites are all about content. You can have a lot of glitz (Flash), and say nothing. With CSS, you still need to say something.
 
Web site domains are available on a first-come, first-served basis. Pick one that you like, and buy it right away, if it's available.

As for which to use, I say go for the CSS. The reason? Not everyone has or wants Flash on their computer. For example, I have a netbook, and running Flash adds to my very limited disk space, and my CPU isn't high-powered enough to run Flash well.

I pass over Flash-heavy sites as a result.

CSS is implemented at the server side, and every browser just needs to know how to render the code it receives. It's far more user-friendly than Flash.

Web sites are all about content. You can have a lot of glitz (Flash), and say nothing. With CSS, you still need to say something.
 
Back
Top