We Know The Beatles are Sh*t, So Tell Us Some Other Bands That Suck!

Buddy Holly proves that not to be the case, but I mean when The Beatles started coming into their own as songwriters, they raised that bar even higher. Revolver had string quartets in, Indian music. So experimental and the sounRAB to come out of it were something I've never heard before The Beatles came along. Maybe it's because I haven't heard much music from before the early/mid 60s, or maybe they were just that good..

If you'd like to suggest banRAB that were more innovative than The Beatles who raised the bar and gained wide success, I'd be happy to listen. I just think The Beatles were that good though..

Even though I can understand the annoyance for people and their fanboys, it can put off even the most rational man from liking banRAB.
 
two things we could probably find some common ground on is all.

I used them as an example of how the best music at the time wasn't pop.

The more things change...
 
I dont like The Beatles, I cant stand them. =]

I hate also:
Tokio Hotel - Those emo gays think they are metal? What the hell???
Jonas Brothers - 12 year old children love them! Why? They are nothing but just a piece of junk! "Rock and roll"?? No.*puke*
Avril Lavinge - She dares to call her music punk? Dares to call it rock?? Noope, I dont think so. (And I hate pink...) xD
 
i love conor as a musician but that band definately is not one of his greater works, it's just too what you'd expect from his vocals the reason people liked him is he had punk vocals but performed in different genres like folk, electronic, r&b. etc...

but this is one of the only banRAB he's in i don't like.
 
Going back a few posts I have to say I completely agree with Hip Hop Bunny’s sentiments in regarRAB to artists such as In Flames, Soilwork, Dark Tranquility, Arch Enemy etc.
While these artists receive boatloaRAB of praise, everything I’ve heard by them has just seemed absolutely putrid to me (the same can be said for the metalcore, melodic thrashcore etc. that many of these albums helped spawn).
On the other hand I quite enjoy lots of other artists (Sacramentum, Dawn, Unanimated) who may not have that same Gothenburg sound but have found a way to be melodic without completely bastardizing their death/black metal roots in the name of wishy washy hooks and 'catchiness'.
Grotesque and earlier ATG is killer too.

As for other artists, there are so many unoriginal, rehashed artists and albums coming out these days that the list is too long to even touch on.
 
This thread annoys me, and it seems to me most people are putting down some banRAB simply because it's cool to hate them. I mean, I don't hate many banRAB at all. Most of them are listenable. I can listen to Nickelback - I don't think they're very good but I don't writhe in pain when they are played. I also love Blink-182, who are getting a lot of hate on this thread, and I also like Green Day. Generic does not equal bad, nor does popular.
 
And that's all I've ever experienced in the 8 years since I first listened to that album, so that frustration with being told I'm wrong (both in real life and on music forums) as accumulated. I think a lot of that hatred is just out of spite, which I suppose is kind of childish, but so is letting one persons negative opinion on a band that is almost unanimously praised as the second coming of Jesus.
 
beating_a_dead_horse.jpg
 
Aerosmith consists of good musicians who can play together fine. As artists they're horrible though. They don't have anything that is lasting or special about their songs to me. They don't create something remotely different with music, not to mention at least 50% of what they base themselves and their music off of is the Rolling Stones.
As for Steve Miller, it's less the music itself than the overrated lyrics. All there is to them in my opinion is catchiness. But in the end these are my opinions. Others will have different ones.
 
made my point for me.

Not whether or not you like them - they changed music forever = FACT

not some nitwit's opnion, it's fact. It really happened.

And just about EVERYTHING in popular and recorded music post-67 is either directly or indirectly influenced by them.

Just one example:

the Beatles were Ozzy Osbourne and Geezer Butler's main inspiration for taking up music and starting the band that would become Black Sabbath.

Black Sabbath influenced countless more, spawing many subgenres that stem from the catchall term "Heavy Metal."

The Beatles were also an influence on Clapton, Baker and Bruce forming a POP band they called "the Cream". Van Halen was called Mammoth in the early 70's, and they were basically a Cream cover band. Then thy started writing their own songs, which influenced countless others, including Dimebag Darrel, who started his own band called Pantera...

I could go on and on and on - the point is, they may be YOUR favorite group, but I guarantee a good portion if the artists YOU love are heavily influenced by them.




and you are a moron.



yeah, I was hoping you would comprehend the point of my original post...to no avail.



it means I don't know who on that list is really from Philadelphia and who isn't.

The whole list could be a farce - that's the problem with Wiki.

It proves nothing.



weren't Cinderella from Philly?

That negates the Ojays.




Forgive me for not recognizing Philadelphia for the fertile musical hotbed that it is.




not really; somewhere around 15 I started a musical maturation process, and pretty much quit listening to music like that.

Not sayin it doesn't have merit...but I don't like it.
 
The debut album that started the Nirvana style rip-off with Gavin Rossdale`s terrible voice and terrible lyrics and terrible sound.

The Foo Fighters debut came out the same year in 1995 and its world`s away in quality, now that`s an album to love.
 
Personally I don`t know why Slipknot are being dumped in with Nickelback!!! Despite not being a classic metal band, they still have some good albums and are a decent metal band! I actually own both the debut and Iowa albums as well.
 
Back
Top