We are having a debate in class: the big bang vs. God creation. help?

  • Thread starter Thread starter KatieLady9
  • Start date Start date
K

KatieLady9

Guest
I'm for God Creation. I have a few points for why the big bang is unlikely, but I need more. Could you help me out? Thanks! :)

P.S. Don't yell at me how I'm wrong on how I think that God created the universe. I'm just doing this for class.
 
You deny the big bang yet claim that the universe had an origin and that that origin is god? Sorry, but without the big bang you have no leg to stand on. You can't prove the universe had a "beginning" which means you can't smuggle in the kalam cosmological argument.

Also, god creation of what? Given the laws of our universe, scientists theorize that our universe is composed of less than 2% baryonic matter, that is matter consisting of protons, neutrons, and electrons making dark matter the most common form of matter in our universe. Our universe if anything is far more suited for the creation of black holes than it is for supporting life. Life on our planet constitutes only an insignificant portion of our universe.
 
God uses many tools, and there is no reason one cannot believe that God used the Big Bang to create the universe.

There is no scientific evidence for the existence of God, which is not to say that God does not exist--only that God is not subject to scientific investigation. If your class is a science class, please be respectful of the limitations of science. The existence of God is not relevant to the content of science, and the evidence for the Big Bang is very, very strong.

Good luck.
 
Back
Top