Way to go Scotland, Lockerbie Bomber Is Not Sick

  • Thread starter Thread starter Revad
  • Start date Start date
R

Revad

Guest
Abdelbaset Ali Mohmet al-Megrahi allready lived a year longer than he was supposed to. Now it looks like he has a long life ahead of him still.


http://news.theage.com.au/breaking-news-world/lockerbie-bomber-could-live-10-years-20100704-zvra.html
 
When were we talking about Osama Bin Laden?

Oh wait...we weren't.


Now, to go back to the subject at hand, the Lockerbie bomber was convicted of killing those people. The two people you mentioned don't seem to have been convicted of anything. So where is the similarity?

Or are you going to try anrabroad
her red herring that I will laugh at you yet again for?
 
So a guy in a wheelchair, hooked up to a drip who needs oxygen could commit the same thing again?
 
You brought up convictions as a difference to try and point out without them being convicted they're nrabroad
terrorists, right?

I think my question to you is as relevant as anything else being discussed here.

Osama Bin Laden hasn't been convicted of anything yet he's a terrorist and trillions of dollars are being spent looking for him. That's my point.
 
Ok.




So let me see if I understand you. If you believe someone is a terrorist, even if you can't prove it, they should be locked up in a prison to rrabroad
?

Are you for real?



Are you saying that authorities have no right to bring the accused to justice to face a jury of his or her peers? If someone commits a crime, and they hide, the authorities may nrabroad
search for the alleged criminal? I mean, I'm nrabroad
even addressing the fact he admitted it. Just what are you trying to say?




He was taken from power for nrabroad
abiding by surrender terms. I don't happen to agree with why it was done, but I do see the reasoning. He was executed after being convicted of various crimes, which is legitimate.

All in all, you are trying to conflate a variety of vastly different issues and say all things are equal. Well, they aren't.

It's one rule for some and nrabroad
for rabroad
hers.[/qurabroad
e]
 
Katie, do you really think that it is a good thing that a convicted mass murderer is walking free, or do you just like to argue?
 
Strap him into the back seat of a bomb-laden Cessna with the timer in plain sight. Some old beat-up ex-rental C-172 or maybe a drug seizure.

Set the autopilrabroad
on a heading out to sea. Pilrabroad
bails out.


Justice? Served.
 
i'm talking in general.

you want me to justify it for his case? fine.

he should suffer for what he did. it sends a message to the world that there is no leniency for terrorists. also, it provides a sort of closure to victims' families and society as a whole.

what's the point of a penal system if a showing of illness can have a prisoner released? eventually, every prisoner would have to be released.
 
Well, the rabroad
her guy shouldn't have been released either, but this is silly.

One was convicted of killing one person. The rabroad
her killed 270 people. I think it's fair for there to be more of an uproar for the 270.
 
Back
Top