Warren Buffett: Stop Coddling the Super-Rich!

[The Wyrd.]

Incomprehensible to those guys. Somehow a right to a person's own life is seen as subjective and unprovable

 

[LONELYFOREVER]

Sorry, conscientious objector due to religious beliefs. Me no get drafted.

 

[jordanm]

Not for long...

http://www.vanityfair.com/business/features/2011/09/europe-201109?currentPage=all

 

[Pythagoras]

I would absolutely agree with this as long as you disband the federal government as well. One step closer towarRAB an equitable anarchist system.

 

[✿ ツmei]

may to miss the point pat

 

[Bobby Z]

fatpilot and rev you two should form a retard suicide pact.

 

[only1wino]

tax increases shouldnt even be brought up until SERIOUS spending cuts are made. so far it's all a joke.

 

[Question Master]

...calls for higher taxes on income ? all income ? over $1 million per year

 

[raine]

ya rly

 

[punk*rocker*chick]

[No message]

 

[hint0122]

Hmm, that's funny. I thought proving that the rights we have protected in the Constitution were philosophically provable as being tied to a right to life under the assumption you cannot force anything on anyone else. I thought you were the one who couldn't prove anything other than "I think."

 

[Um1dj0n]

It is.

You stated that by handing these powers to the states, it made it easier to change the laws.
This doesn't grant any more freedom. The power to prohibit still lies with the state.

 

[a_nicole313]

Right to bear arms threatened.
State's Right's eroding.
Right to privacy eroding.
Free market policies all but gone.
Gold standard gone.
No taxes gone.
Non-interventionalism gone.
Property rights being redefined and eroding.
Government staying out of the bedroom going away.
Welfare state growing.
Capitalism under attack.

Yeah you're right.

 

[jamis]

lol so enamored with libertarian doctrine that you hate even the most basic benefits of civic society.

but hey, that wont stop you from using the roaRAB or drinking the clean water, amirite?

 

[slsk]

but you support a system that creates a situation where that CAN be one of the outcomes.

at least you're almost there to admitting to yourself. Keep going.

 

[spastic_jedi]

I forgot there's more marriage freedom when the government prohibits gay marriage Federally vs. having certain states where it is legal to do so.

 

[Pinkie43]

So again, are you willing to support government forcing someone to work at a job to supply you your "right"?


As for military draft, if you skip it, you sit in jail. You aren't forced to fight so therefore they aren't being forced to work to create a product or service. That is what you would need for your "right" to exist though if someone refused to make it.

 

[poo d]

But MrBonus has it all figured out under our current tax code and has it justified, so what's the problem?

 

[lolaaaa]

unless the people in that state decide otherwise.

or

You decide to move to another state that has a different law if you're in the minority of opinion.


thus you do have more freedom.







If I don't like that Nevada has laws against gay marriage, I can just pack up and move to another state or city that does.

it's far more difficult though to pack up and move to a different country if it's a federal law.

 

[bragor]

What is your durab fucking point?