I do a lot of web browsing and would like 3G. Am considering the MotoRAZR V3xx instead of waiting for the N75. I?ve seen many positive comments in the Motorola forums, but naturally those are Moto enthusiasts, so I thought I?d solicit the more critical opinion of Nokia partisans here.
I had a first-generation RAZR and wasn?t impressed. The UI was clunky and poorly designed, screen resolution was low, voice quality was distorted especially on speakerphone, and the VGA camera was far inferior to the VGA camera in my 6620. I gave it to a friend after I had hacked it to death. He took it to Panama, had it revived there at a shop he knew, and kept it with my blessings.
By all accounts the V3xx is a vast improvement. They say the UI has been revamped, the screen is larger with a higher resolution, audio is clearer, and the camera is now 1.3 mp. And of course it has US 3G, which is supposed to work very well. My main reservation is the Opera browser, which I?m not fond of, and the camera, which I?m sure can?t measure up in any respect to the N75's.
Has anybody here had hands-on experience with the V3xx, and what did you think?
I had a first-generation RAZR and wasn?t impressed. The UI was clunky and poorly designed, screen resolution was low, voice quality was distorted especially on speakerphone, and the VGA camera was far inferior to the VGA camera in my 6620. I gave it to a friend after I had hacked it to death. He took it to Panama, had it revived there at a shop he knew, and kept it with my blessings.
By all accounts the V3xx is a vast improvement. They say the UI has been revamped, the screen is larger with a higher resolution, audio is clearer, and the camera is now 1.3 mp. And of course it has US 3G, which is supposed to work very well. My main reservation is the Opera browser, which I?m not fond of, and the camera, which I?m sure can?t measure up in any respect to the N75's.
Has anybody here had hands-on experience with the V3xx, and what did you think?