Baldrick82 - you did not mention which Usenet-news account you have, but I assume you bought the unlimited monthly?
Usenet-news is an excellent provider of non-expiring blocks, with among the lowest prices and largest selection, but their recently-added unlimited monthly service at $19/month is not the cheapest. Ngroups.net is owned and run by the same people as Usenet-News, as well as both resellers of Highwinds-Media service, but Ngroups prices its unlimited at $15/month. Unlike Usenet-News, Ngroups does not offer SSL access.
For unlimited service, UNS is probably the best deal for the money right now - 101 day retention + SSL for $15/mo unlimited. But be aware that their quality has reportedly not been perfect recently. UNS runs its own server farm.
I have not used UNS, so I can't comment on their service from experience. I will say that for the two best-known block account providers - Usenet-News and Astraweb - Usenet-News has much better tech support, as it's 24/7 and always fast replies; Astraweb's tech guys, although quite competent, don't answer emails on evenings, weekends, or holidays.
Windy72 said:
Good quality block accounts for me. More NSP's should offer this along with good monthly accounts. Why don't they?
I suspect that they would rather have users paying each and every month - instead of paying one time for a non-expiring block and then nursing on it for the rest of the year. Maybe that's why Giganews dropped its block account offering.
Monthly accounts were offered by NSPs first, and anyway most companies (in any industry) tend to simply copy their competitors. For a long time, Astraweb was about the only usenet provider to buck the trend by offering any cheaply-priced non-expiring block accounts - and they built their business on it.
It was once common for many usenet pay-providers (particularly the many resellers) to charge according to the bandwidth being throttled. Many services still price their accounts this way, but it seems that few users today are interested in being throttled. Resellers, of course, generally pay for their service monthly on a per-connection/per bandwidth basis, so it was probably easier for them to craft customer accounts similarly. (or what's known as "cash flow": Since they are having to pay their back-end provider each month regardless of usage, they want to have their customers do the same with them.)