Ultimate Guide To Folding@home

congrats VB1234

I just joined this project, I'm gooman528 (from my e-mail addy), but can't yet see my name on the list yet, probably because i just started, i don't know.

Anyway, I got pentium 1.8 GHz, with 256 RAM
 
I just noticed that there are already 47 KLB members folding! Perhaps it would be a good idea to request a new members group, as it might encourage more members to start folding@home... :)
 
:angry: :angry:


[11:15:22] Finished a frame (209)
[11:21:43] Finished a frame (210)
[11:27:39] Finished a frame (211)
[11:33:32] Finished a frame (212)
[11:35:42]
[11:35:42] Received faulty work unit.
[11:35:52] logfile size: 20480
[11:35:52] - Writing 20992 bytes of core data to disk.
[11:35:52]
Click to expand...
 
rr3.gif


Meep Meep!

Click ---> http://www.nonstick.com/sounds/Road_Runner/ltrr_003.wav
 
can somebody explain me whats WU and when i finished 400 what will happen :smilie4:
so far i did 14/400 but still my name is not listed in team list, and suppose if i shutdown my pc what will happen,
sorry things r so confusing :lol:
 
yeah, worth a go, although the front page doesnt seem to be changing, nice if we could get a wee link next to post count and members ranks.

i'll hopefully try get the site finished soon, im alo working on my personal site and my monkey one. :) so hopefully soon,
but im also gonna be moving into my flat at the end of the week, so got some packing to do.
i'll get more up tomorrow if i can.

suggestions are very welcome. :D
http://www.livy.myby.co.uk/folding/

edit: also what does everyone think about a team name change? FST F@H or something like that?
 
I've come to the conclusion that the new team stats are screwed. We've just been passed by "p2p_community". But before the new stats there were no threats. And if you look at their individual points they are quite impressive on a daily basis, yet they have zero points for the week.

Since they have the same position in the Stanford lists (which is the source of these stats) I suspect hacking. The top of their group ("Le_PoUnT") supposedly has had 159 active processors in the last week, yet both his daily and weekly points are zero. And he has supposedly performed 842 WU's on one project, but only 1 on each of another 4 projects. Similar trends can be seen for their number 3 "xlybox".

This is obviously nonsense, yet equally obviously the results have been returned to Stanford otherwise they would not have been credited with the points. The only conclusion is that the same results have been returned time and time again.

If my conclusions are correct, then statistically this dangerously skews the possibilities, not only making those results worthless, but undermining a lot of work done by other people.

I hope I'm wrong.
 
Code: 
[20:59:38] Folding@home Gromacs Core
[20:59:38] Version 1.56 (February 2, 2004)
[20:59:38] 
[20:59:38] Preparing to commence simulation
[20:59:38] - Looking at optimizations...
[20:59:38] - Created dyn
[20:59:38] - Files status OK
[20:59:40] - Expanded 388311 -> 1861229 (decompressed 479.3 percent)
[20:59:40] - Starting from initial work packet
[20:59:40] 
[20:59:40] Project: 858 (Run 361, Clone 6, Gen 1)
[20:59:40] 
[20:59:40] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[20:59:40] Entering M.D.
[20:59:47] Protein: p858_p53dimer858
[20:59:47] 
[20:59:47] Writing local files
[20:59:48] Extra SSE boost OK.
[20:59:48] Writing local files
[20:59:50] Completed 0 out of 2500000 steps
 
i'll add a link to the download page for people running other versions, i just put that up as somehting to put on the page the now.

i know the spelling a bit dodgy the now, i done it at about 12.30 last night.
 
Back
Top