:lol:
TorrentDay fakes stats and members! Be aware of this site.
- Thread starter le coq géant
- Start date
Chazzmin H
New member
Seeder shows 3430 and on your client: 1723, maybe they didn't allow you to scrape whole seed peers
Here we go again... :whistling
199 more to lvl 3 (1000)
New member
Yes,and how many members are fake? 
This tracker is a joke.
This tracker is a joke.
Stefanie H
New member
hello i am new !
cfoster001
New member
Donate and ask for Resident Evil 1.5 (PS1 game)
they will crap themselves, its real but only 6 (or not many more) were ever released, and the chances of finding it on P2P are about 1 bil to 1 (if not more)
they will crap themselves, its real but only 6 (or not many more) were ever released, and the chances of finding it on P2P are about 1 bil to 1 (if not more)
You're not alone in that point of view.
You're not, it's quite well-hidden. I only knew about it after BitSoup linked to their delacct.php (I don't remember if it was on their FAQ, rules or user agreement) and I tried doing the same on another TBdev tracker.
bighopes35
New member
Sure, 30-50k users is a great amount that any tracker can survive on. However, lying about the fact that you have an extra 100,000 non existent members just to attract further users brings up certain issues of integrity that make me extremely uncomfortable about using a tracker such as this, and I'm sure many others would agree with me.
Of course you can have a sysop with an ID above 1, I'm not sure what you're trying to prove with this. The point I was trying to make was that the owner of the site has a user ID of 99904, and thus there are no ids below that, as they are sorted by date joined (and you can check, there aren't any). Then the ID's go to 200,000, meaning that there's approximately 100k members on the site, half of what they claim. If even those numbers are legit.
Perhaps you're the one that should learn how Utorrent operates. When you start a torrent, in the seeders/leechers column you get two numbers. The first is how many you are ACTIVELY connected to, and the second is how many there are TOTAL on the torrent. When I started the torrent, before I even began downloading, the 2nd number only showed half of what was on the site.
And the peer limit is certainly not made to stop anti piracy companies. You can set the connected peers limit to as much as you want, it's just simply not feasible/possible to connect to that many peers at once. Over a certain period on a popular torrent on BCG I managed to connect to over 600 peers at once, a little dumb on my part but trackers certainly don't limit the amount of peers you can connect to in order to "stop anti piracy agencies".
I really have no idea what point you're trying to get at here, if you care to elaborate further I'll respond. I never mentioned anything about the percentage of active users at a site.
I know a sysop who is hidden and id is just above 1
Of course you can have a sysop with an ID above 1, I'm not sure what you're trying to prove with this. The point I was trying to make was that the owner of the site has a user ID of 99904, and thus there are no ids below that, as they are sorted by date joined (and you can check, there aren't any). Then the ID's go to 200,000, meaning that there's approximately 100k members on the site, half of what they claim. If even those numbers are legit.
torrents.ru - their torrents have 6-7k peers each of them, if you download, they will not allow you to get inside 4-7k peers at once, they will allow you to reach maximum to 50-60 peers first, they are doing this for anti piracy companies not to trace all swarm.
Learn some C++ coding and MySQL also
Perhaps you're the one that should learn how Utorrent operates. When you start a torrent, in the seeders/leechers column you get two numbers. The first is how many you are ACTIVELY connected to, and the second is how many there are TOTAL on the torrent. When I started the torrent, before I even began downloading, the 2nd number only showed half of what was on the site.
And the peer limit is certainly not made to stop anti piracy companies. You can set the connected peers limit to as much as you want, it's just simply not feasible/possible to connect to that many peers at once. Over a certain period on a popular torrent on BCG I managed to connect to over 600 peers at once, a little dumb on my part but trackers certainly don't limit the amount of peers you can connect to in order to "stop anti piracy agencies".
I really have no idea what point you're trying to get at here, if you care to elaborate further I'll respond. I never mentioned anything about the percentage of active users at a site.
diane72112
New member
is this gonna end up like vip when they disabled almost 10k users within a day?
nope, i'm with you :yup:
no doubt about that.. lol
I do know about the possibility of having an "idle" userbase, but the fact of the matter is that rather than just being idle, on Torrentday 100,000 member ID's are blatantly missing. It's not a matter of having part of the user base idle (which is even more likely in a new tracker like TD where users may have joined on a whim), it's the fact that while UserID's go up to 200,000, there aren't any that exist under 99,000. Which means that they are most certainly lying about there userbase, not that 100k users are "idle".
And with that kind of integrity, those snatch numbers should be taken with a grain of salt at best.
Also - how often do users who are just "casually" asked to advertise the tracker willing to spend 3-4 weeks spamming a tracker url on forums? I think it's safe to say that you're a little more dedicated to the tracker than "not giving a shit".
And with that kind of integrity, those snatch numbers should be taken with a grain of salt at best.
Also - how often do users who are just "casually" asked to advertise the tracker willing to spend 3-4 weeks spamming a tracker url on forums? I think it's safe to say that you're a little more dedicated to the tracker than "not giving a shit".
Olivia Grace 3/25/09!
New member
I've just deleted my account from there
They are a really weird community!
They are a really weird community!
You bet your wife
New member
Signed up mid December, loving it to be honest.
mookie pookie
New member
I don't. :whistling
I ♥ TWILIGHT MOVIE!
New member
YoYoY, you didn't hear about torrentday coz Torrentday is only 4 months old
4 Months and 200k membership, means 50k/month LoL
4 Months and 200k membership, means 50k/month LoL
icrashalot
New member
That's your opinion about ScT
I respect ur opinion. everyone have his own opinion.
in my opinion ScT was way too greater then SCC.
SCC is at the top now and i am a great fan of SCC but ScT had great functions and had a very clean design + was very attractive :yup:
My opinion is that SCC is better than ScT ever was because it has not yet become the exclusive playground of seedbox whores.However I think IPT owns them both in a big retarded bt ownage kind of way.
Don't care for SCC much either to tell the truth .When people are more concerned about how/where they download something rather what they actually download I kind of lose respect for them.Speaking of the members not the tracker/staff btw although I wouldn't recognize any of their staff if they ran me over in a pink Toyota.
PS Karagara rulez suck on that etc etc.
Good job with the "research" Rart, thanks for taking the time to do that.
Yes, I noticed this too. Speeds were also very slow for torrents with so many peers, whereas other big trackers such as TL or IPT manage to max out my download in no time. :huh:
It is possible for the tracker to limit the amount of peers delivered, but most of them will just proceed to give you more IPs every time you ask.
Yes, I noticed this too. Speeds were also very slow for torrents with so many peers, whereas other big trackers such as TL or IPT manage to max out my download in no time. :huh:
It is possible for the tracker to limit the amount of peers delivered, but most of them will just proceed to give you more IPs every time you ask.