Mr GoldDigger :)
New member
That's not potential. It's green.
If they really wanted to make a sequel that was worth making, they'd make a sequel to The Incredibles. TS3 is basically The Brave Little Toaster with toys instead of appliances. And wasn't the original Cars one of the least appreciated Pixar films ever made or at least panned by some audiences?
Still . . . five sequels to Kung Fu Panda? Egads, that's a bit much. Then again, Harry Potter's about to have film number six in a few months, and two more afterwards. James Bond's been in more than 20 official movies. Jason and Freddy have also been in multiple films.
Po is an interesting character, but he's nowhere being as culturally relevant as those theatrical icons. Plus, shouldn't the animated series negate the need to create FIVE sequels?
And for the record, Shrek and Shrek 2 both made over $200 million, with the latter becoming one of the top-five highest-grossing films of all time. Doesn't mean it's a good film. Titanic wasn't all that either.
If they really wanted to make a sequel that was worth making, they'd make a sequel to The Incredibles. TS3 is basically The Brave Little Toaster with toys instead of appliances. And wasn't the original Cars one of the least appreciated Pixar films ever made or at least panned by some audiences?
Still . . . five sequels to Kung Fu Panda? Egads, that's a bit much. Then again, Harry Potter's about to have film number six in a few months, and two more afterwards. James Bond's been in more than 20 official movies. Jason and Freddy have also been in multiple films.
Po is an interesting character, but he's nowhere being as culturally relevant as those theatrical icons. Plus, shouldn't the animated series negate the need to create FIVE sequels?
And for the record, Shrek and Shrek 2 both made over $200 million, with the latter becoming one of the top-five highest-grossing films of all time. Doesn't mean it's a good film. Titanic wasn't all that either.