B
bill_of_wildstallions
Guest
terror than terrorism itself? Just something I was thinking about, there have been 3 high profile Terror attacks since 2001 and all three have inside job written all over them , so now... Since 9/11 3,000 died during the 9/11 attacks, 76 in london, 191 in madrid , and hundreds of thousands in public bombings in countries the U.S. and it's plastic Coalition of the willing seem to ignore.
Meanwhile the number of civilian deaths is nearing in the millions all over the middle east. Does this really make sense? also what have been the benefits of 'combating terrorism' so far? Terrorism existed before bush, it exists now just the same , and it hasn't slowed down pretty much anywhere -- at least not to the point that will justify so much collateral damage.
Bill from kansas - relax, I'm trying to say the wrong people are being labeled terrorists.
I'm latin-american and have family that say the American CIA are the biggest terrorist group on planet earth. Now I'm not supposed to beleive scarred aunts and uncles because you said so? or maybe because it's not on tv?
what if columbia and argentina decided to combat 'American Tyranny' what would you say then?
Bill of kansas - also that'a weird twist of words there pal, I can do the same look.
If 10 people died in a murder case would you kill half your state to find the killers who could be anywhere in the world?
I'm not justifying terrorism btw, again, I just think it should be fought in a smarter way. The country should spend on securing borders, tighting access into the US, and securing infrastructure you can not stop terrorism with war, all war does is create more terrorism.
What you have to do is save yourself and secure you own country.
Meanwhile the number of civilian deaths is nearing in the millions all over the middle east. Does this really make sense? also what have been the benefits of 'combating terrorism' so far? Terrorism existed before bush, it exists now just the same , and it hasn't slowed down pretty much anywhere -- at least not to the point that will justify so much collateral damage.
Bill from kansas - relax, I'm trying to say the wrong people are being labeled terrorists.
I'm latin-american and have family that say the American CIA are the biggest terrorist group on planet earth. Now I'm not supposed to beleive scarred aunts and uncles because you said so? or maybe because it's not on tv?
what if columbia and argentina decided to combat 'American Tyranny' what would you say then?
Bill of kansas - also that'a weird twist of words there pal, I can do the same look.
If 10 people died in a murder case would you kill half your state to find the killers who could be anywhere in the world?
I'm not justifying terrorism btw, again, I just think it should be fought in a smarter way. The country should spend on securing borders, tighting access into the US, and securing infrastructure you can not stop terrorism with war, all war does is create more terrorism.
What you have to do is save yourself and secure you own country.