Tin Foil Crue: Architects & Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7

[ihate.people]

You say "largest attack on american soil" like thats relevant to the cost. How much you think it cost mcweigh to blow up the OKC building? Probably thousanRAB at most.

Im sure the cost of organizing a bunch of durkas to get flying lessons, paying off a construction team, and some explosives dont compare to the tens of millions he wouldve lost in vacancies and required upgrades. Not to mention the billions made in insurance payoRAB and a brand new tower.

Also, lets keep in mind that the cost was likely shared between the parties that had an interest in this. Follow the money trail.

 

[Katelyns expecting™]

what evidence? you take selective fragments that somewhat go with your theory and push them as evidence.

 

[RosaInCali4nia]

i guess not its symmetrical, fall-in-its-own-footprint demise

 

[ParamoresOrangeHope]

Anyone else already chime in with "Architects are not demolition experts?"


can't believe there is yet another thread about this bullshit.

 

[kayleigh e]

Im not disagreeing with you that the building was clobered with debris or that parts were on fire, or that it wouldnt have collapsed on its own in time. But within hours of being hit and for it to collapse perfectly in its footprint, to me is ridiculous.

The deutsche bank building was also hit with debris



It stood straight and tall for 10 years before a decision was made to dismantle it. And you're telling me WTC7 was damaged so much more than this that it pancaked within hours? I cannot get there.

 

[ChiC_pArIsIEnnE]

there is no apparent structural damage to WTC7 in this picture.

 

[DBall]

So the owner of WTC7 had the building rigged with explosives in case the collapse of the other two towers didn't bring it down as well?

 

[Tom Gainer]

Why are you people so surprised that the buildings fell downward? You know, the direction gravity is pulling them?

 

[Wasabi MiLK]

Someone made the mistake of listening to the instruction to bring the building down, and accidentally reported that it had already collapsed.
After the live report of the apparent collapse of WTC7, live feed was cut off from an unknown source of interference.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltP2t9nq9fI&feature=fvst

 

[Mom to Matt & Makayla]

"Thermal expansion of a beam"

What does that mean? Heat caused a steel beam to expand, which caused a whole building to collapse symmetrically? That is the part I don't understand.

 

[sexychick756]

deleted, along with the bofa docs

 

[TigerLilly]

yes, i forgot that to you, the US Navy is an unreliable source. you could also try calling their press office and asking them, but i bet they all buy into the lie there too!

 

[renee70466]

and even the people that wrote that report say that it's flawed due to being rushed/minimal funding/gov't pressure

 

[Summmer.]

you can read the report online

they've even got some CAD-type simulations and whatnot

the press conference was a pretty big deal

[y]iSnjyZNYlW8[/y]

 

[pi8carrots]

note: some structural merabers omitted for believability.... LOL

 

[mal nerak]

Wow, compelling rebuttal.

 

[Gerdie]

you'd think architects of all people would know something about structural integrity and shit.

 

[rajarshi s]

i think the "official story" is more off the fucking wall than even the hardcore troll truther shit i've read

 

[Orla:)]

yes for a perfectly demoed building it does. It doesnt have to be perfect if its supposed to look unexpected.

And the amount of work is irrelevant, with enough time a very small group of workers could accomplish almost anything.

 

[Priya <33]

You again. This moron thinks cuba had something to do with 9/11.
In the link you posted says it only used 7.4 tons of the steel from the WTCs.