Tin Foil Crue: Architects & Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7

NIST video showing computer simulated collapse and some brief explanation
[y]PK_iBYSqEsc[/y]
Honestly, it looks like their simulations don't reflect the video reality. They show a 2D model of a progressive right-to-left collapse, but the building would have taken longer to fall, viewed from some angle. Strangly, all angles of video footage of WTC7 show what appears to be the same speed even collapse. Support structure that had not been compromised would have given something of a load-spreading effect, causing an uneven collapse. It would be understandable that such an uneven collapse might not be viewable from every angle, since dust and smoke might hide taller parts of the building until they fell, but there's no such video evidence.

Even NIST's own simulations don't reflect reality!
And remeraber, all you "conspiracy theorists" that believe in the government-generated media-parroted conspiracy theory, debris did not cause structural damage. Even in the NIST video above, the debris was only responsible for starting fires on the lower levels of the building. A fascinating improbability, since the same debris didn't seem to start fires in the lower floors of every other building it fell on. Additionally, the fire suppression system was working in part of the building. I wonder if some of the fire suppression system ever kicked on from all the heat and smoke that had been rising through the interior? Not sure we'll ever have that answer.


Really huge building fire example 1
WinRABor Building, Madrid Spain, 2/12/2005
[y]th2bnG_7UyY[/y]

Example 2, Holland
[y]1h9TOFP7ViY[/y]

Anyone else have more building fire / collapse examples?
 
there are too many inconsistencies and coincidences. if you ignore this fact, you are an idiot.

i don't know what happened, but i do know the official story is complete bullshit. because the official story is bullshit, it raises a shitton of other questions.
 
in 100 years they will be looking back on 911 as being the turning point where this nation went downhill and the start of citizens loosing their freedoms to their own government.

not to mention by the time the wars in afghanistan and iraq are done, we will be at war for probably at least 20 years.
 
Truthers have become so fucking desperate, back in 2006 this pre-rigged bullshit would of been considering laughable by the Truthers, but after having one theory shot down after another they are resorting to it.
 
I'm using it to show you the inconsistency. You and others keep rattling on about debris hitting WTC7, but it DOES NOT MATTER according to the official explanation. So stop saying it like it does. It would be like saying "but there was a satellite dish on top of the building!!!" as if it mattered.
 
Its simple, lose wtc7 and 2 buildings it hits when it falls or load it with explosives when built so they can control it. I have a feeling all buildings have a panic button located somewhere central in the city.
 
Maybe you can show us a building built with demolition countermeasures in the event of reptilian invasion, other than your bunker/masturbation den?
 
if WTC collapsed to the side that was hit by debris and where the fire was, i would say fine.


My whole problem is the way that it collapsed. A "chain reaction" failure doesn't happen fast enough for a collapse to happen the way it happened, bottom line. I'm not sure how ANYONE could look at the video of that collapsing and say "oh yeah, that was due to a fire and subsequent thermal expansion"
 
Back
Top