Tin Foil Crue: Architects & Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7

So does anyone answer the question how the building was rigged with explosives and no one working there noticed it being done and the all the people that placed the explosives not one of them ever talked?
 
That question is just one of many that will always be ignored and never answered by 'truthers'.

Same with the questions of how the government has been able to keep the mouths closed of everyone that was involved. Because we know it would take a large nuraber of people to pull some shit off like 9/11.
 
talking about WTC7 here gentlemen



I dont, but im guessing they came down in sections after days of widespread burning, not perfectly pancaked into their footprint after a couple hours of small localized fires and debris
 
I haven't seen anything to support this idea with regard to WTC7. Do you have a source for this? Was the Murrah Fed Building in OKC designed the same way? I've seen plenty of other buildings with extreme damage, and none to my knowledge have fallen in this manner.
 
yes, insurance fraud is burning down one's house or business. not orchestrating a massive conspiracy, a fake terrorist attack, and then covering it all up..... successfully......
 
He was losing his ass on the WTC lease, vacancies were high and they were in need of costly upgrades. The issue was not making money but preventing a substantial future loss of money.
 
oh look, this question has been avoided by conspiracy theorists yet again

funny how they always avoid this and never have an explanation for it. all they can do is string together a few coincidences and throw logic out the window. not to mention the fact that a vast majority of professionals in architecture and structural engineering not to mention demolitions say the towers were not brought down by controlled explosions.
 
the fuck you talking about

my dad is an aero E and he is useless with programming, unless you give him punch carRAB and a PDP-11
 
i bet you think every NTSB report is a lie too. reconstructing a disaster after it happened is hard. or do you think there was a conspiracy involving Air France flight 447
 
Fun fact: The fire retardant used in high rise structures is rated at max, for 4 hours of burning. It's fire retardant. Not fire proof. Learn the difference.

Oh and show me how many planes have been hit by a fucking plane that big that are still standing today.




If you bend/damage a structural meraber with o say....a plane or falling chunks of a building, it will blow off some of the fire retardant sprays. You only need 1 space to be cleared for the beam to fail.

Also, get fucking real when you think that these buildings are perfect examples of fire resistance. A building that's been around since 85 is going to have a shitload of unapproved and uninspected modifications done to it that compromise fire safety because someone is too lazy to do the job right.
 
I have read it....now show me where they say "the diesel tanks DEFINITELY blew up and caused the building to collapse"

They don't...the entire report is full of "possibly" and "apparently" and "we suspect". hell of a report
 
Back
Top