Sorry this is late, but I've been without Internet for a few months…
My Spider-man 3 review
Take the best parts of two great films, mix them together, and what you end up with is something far inferior to either of the original films. This is the most obvious problem with Spider-man 3.
Don't get me wrong, it is a truly excellent film. That is, until the bell tower scene, where all the delicious ingredients of the recipe are blended together and microwaved into one sickly, over-ambitious mush of an ending which is inferior to all its original ingredients.
The biggest casualty of squishing multiple villains into one movie is that Venom has far too little time. Venom is a huge favourite among fans yet he seems to appear about 15 minutes before the film enRAB, then it's all over. It's all so rushed. The Symbiont should definitely have had its own movie and not had to share with anyone else. But Sam Raimi doesn't like the newer Spider-man villains, apparently, and it's his movie, so the fans can shove it.
The other major problem with the movie is that there is almost no scientific explanation of anything. Indeed, no real explanation of anything of any kind. We are left to guess what has happened regarding the black Spiderman costume/Venom etc. Yes, we could probably figure it out for ourselves, but Spider-man is supposed to be the kind of film where you are told what is happening. Peter is well-known for talking to himself as he swings through the city. That's how stories are driven forwarRAB.
Another trouble the movie has is its abundance of young men. We have Peter… then Harry… then Eddie… then, I suppose, evil Peter, who is quite a different character. (Oh, and of course evil Eddie.) I would have thought one angst-ridden young man of Peter's age is enough to carry an entire movie.
Here are some character-specific complaints I have…
PETER
• Throughout the film, Aunt May seems distrustful and suspicious of what Peter says about Spiderman. Almost as if she knows his secret. Then she never reappears at the end of the film. The whole situation seems really unresolved. Peter never tells her that Spiderman didn't kill the Sandman, or that his uncle's death was actually an accident. No communication. No resolution. (Cramming 2 films into one probably had something to do with it.)
HARRY
• So… the extent of Harry's plot to destroy Peter's life is just to get his girlfriend to leave him? Frankly, that plot sucks.
• So Harry wants to get MJ to break up with Peter… does he really have to break into her house and terrorise her to accomplish this? Why not just ask her out? They were getting quite close in the scene immediately before. (Which, itself, was a bit of editing I thought was very badly paced.)
• Why does MJ go along with Harry willingly, instead of telling Peter that she has been threatened by Harry? (She knows he could kick Harry's ass, after all.)
• Why oh why did Eddie's butler leave it so long to speak up about his dad's death? Just totally incredible!
• In the scene with the goblin bomb, Harry is apparently killed. When we next see him, he's alive and well! The fact he didn't die should be a shock (it certainly was to me). Yet it's not presented this way at all. Peter doesn't seem surprised at all. The music doesn't indicate a shock.
• Peter never apologises to Harry for nearly killing him. Not even at his deathbed.
EDDIE/VENOM
• Eddie/Venom knows Peter's secret, and acquires his powers. This is not explained how or why. Sure, some things you could probably figure out if you didn't know; but I doubt many people would guess that whoever wears the suit inherits the previous wearer's memories and powers!
• Venom is not a typical villain in that he doesn't go around killing people at random — he only wants to kill Peter. This fact is neither pointed out nor explained in the movie.
• Venom needing to team up with Sandman seems a bit pathetic. It weakens both their characters.
• Eddie faked the photo of the black Spiderman doing something bad… at the exact same time that Spiderman started wearing the black suit and became more aggressive. I would say this was phenomenally poor storytelling. It muddles and confuses two independent issues. Eddie has to fake photos of Spidey being bad… but Spidey really is bad… so it really wasn't much of a deception… and it really wasn't necessary.
• Eddie's religious "faith" is incredible. He is (apparently) a Christian yet asks God to kill someone. No Christian would ever believe that God would murder someone on request!
• In the film, Venom says "I am Venom". But the thing about Venom is that it always refers to itself as "we". (Thus when Carnage later identifies himself as "I" it is a shock.)
THE SYMBIONT
• Why was the symbiont attracted to Peter? Why did the meteorite land near Peter? Was it pure coincidence?
• Why is Peter not at all curious about the origin of the symbiont? He doesn't know it's an alien that came from a meteorite. So what does he suppose the thing is? We never know because Peter seems very reserved about telling us what he thinks or feels. Oh well… he's only the central character.
• So… a goblin bomb in close proximity completely destroys the symbiont, yet it only scars a human. Riiight.
• How did Peter know to go to the bell tower to get the suit off? Lucky guess? (Again, poor storytelling. He had no obvious motivation to go up there.)
• If I were going to try and rip the suit off, I probably wouldn't put the mask on moments earlier. I'd probably… say… leave it off to start with?
• How and why did the symbiont 'infest' the spiderman costume and change its colour without changing anything else about it? What is the explanation behind this? Oh yeah… cos Sam Raimi says so.
THE SANDMAN
• The story with the Sandman's family was never resolved. His child is apparently still living with his bitter and spiteful ex and does not know the truth about him. Nor is he enjoying a healthy relationship with his kid. Some happy ending!
• Exactly what happened to him was not explained. There was no real script to explain what happened other than he got involved in some kind of experiment. Again, we are left guessing where one quick line of dialogue could have put our curiosity at ease.
• The Sandman's character was quite confusing. By the end of the movie, he was portrayed as a misunderstood loner who didn't want to hurt anyone. But not too long before that, he went to great lengths to launch an unprovoked attack on Spiderman.
In summary, Spider-man 3 is either two great films or one not-so-great one.