thieving site

On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:20:00 -0800 (PST), Alfie wrote:


the fact remains that usenet posts are not 'public domain,' and you don't
know what the fuck you're talking about.

suppose someone was idiotic enough to collect all your usenet posts and
publish a book entitled 'the wit and wisdom of alfie asshole.' do you
seriously think you would have no recourse?

blake
 
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:23:41 -0800 (PST), Alfie wrote:


i don't think you understand what 'copyright' and public domain' mean.

blake
 
On Feb 22, 11:33?am, Serene Vannoy wrote:

Hi Serene, it's not different at all! Usenet posts are all over the
net and have been for years. These idiots, (blake the flake and
squirts, his butt buddy), think they have some right to thier posts on
usenet. Pretty damn funny actually.

They've both been in a deep sleep for the last 20 years and have woken
to discover that usenet posts are copied into the public domain in
literally thousands of places each day, around the world. When faced
with the literal truth of the matter, they resort to little tantrums
and childish pouting, (undoubtably you've seen their baby-like
spouting of nonsense).

The fact remains that usenet posts can be copied legally to any site
on the Internet throughout the world. They are by some of the largest
businesses, (Google), and by tens of thousands of regular people,
(including the nice people at the places you mention and "The Food
Junkies" site.

These two fools are angry because they've just been proven to be
idiots. Like idiots everywhere, they get all defencive when shown to
be as ignorant as they obviously are.

Just look how they act! Comical isn't it? I mean the title itself is
funny; "Theiving Site", indeed! Hahahahaaha

Well, I've had my way with them so many times now that it's become
boring. I think I'll skip along to "The Cooking Junkies" fine site and
read some more usenet posts that are there for the taking.

I'm thinking of writing a recipe book and including a little humor by
including these two idiots words of wit in it. That would get the
audience laughing pretty good!

I could call that chapter "The usenet village idiots".

Did you notice that one of them even used a spelling flame of all
things! Probably a couple youngsters on Mommy's PC. No adults I know
would act like they have.

Thanks for your input, Serene!
 
On Feb 22, 2:19?pm, blake murphy, the well know usenet fool and
whiner, wrote:


Since I'm neither "Alfie" nor an asshole, and I wouldn't mind having
the laugh, I would contact the author, congratulate him on choosing my
humor for his book and wish him/her well.

The actual facts are, lowercase blake, YOU don't have a fucking clue
what you're talking about. All usenet posts are absolutely public
domain and are used as such millions of times a day.

The other fact is that you and your little butt buddy sqwertz are
fools and idiots. You pump yourself all full on usenet, (probably for
years), and act like it makes you somebody important.

Here's a clue for you, dumbass and even dumberass, I'll use your posts
anywhere I feel like using them since they most certainly are public
domain and there isn't a single thing you can do about it.

It's been fun playing with two fools of your caliber, but I have
something more important to do now, (I have to take a shit). I'll be
thinking of you *just* before I flush while I'm looking at you two
turds.
 
On 2/22/2011 10:42 AM, Alfie wrote:


That's because something about our Stevie elicits jealousy from people
like you, and I'm (not going to say "we" and speak for anyone else here)
bored with it, and move on.
 
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:10:34 -0500, Cheryl wrote:


I didn't even read that part. It's true that once people see that
"I'm on the case", nobody else really need respond :-)

Unless I was wrong, then everyone woueld speak up in Alphie's favor
:-)

ObFood: No Fluff at the store tonight. Some lady in the checkout said
she saw it in the baking aisle but I checked there. The elusive
fluff...

-sw
 
I have been following this post and find it amazing that anyone is
worried about someone making money off of something posted here.

The problem is attribution. I could use anyone's UseNet name on this
group. It is really not a big deal. Most people do not post with their
real name or include contact information.

If I wanted to gather up recipes from UseNet groups and post them to
a website, it would be difficult to prove it belonged to any one
person.

"No your honor, I am the one who posted the recipe. Watch me sign on
to this UseNet group with the same exact name that appeared next to
the recipe."

Second, you have to consider the fair value of this infringement. If I
post 1000 recipes and a few belong to someone in this group, are you
going to hire an attorney, take me to court in my state and then ask
for what? Enough to get it out of small claims court? Not enough for
an attorney to take it on a contingency basis.

If you are truly worried about the sanctity of your work, do not post
it anonymously on a Usenet group.

On the other hand, I have never considered what a great free content
source UseNet could be for a website. I have seen it done time and
time again but never thought to capitalize on it.


On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:52:11 -0800 (PST), Alfie
wrote:
 
In article ,
[email protected] says...

Seems literacy is also a novelty.


You should pay closer attention to the Terms of Service and Acceptable
Use Policy of your usenet access service? Especially the bit that says

"Searchtech Limited may terminate your subscription if you fail to
comply with these terms and conditions"

Janet
 
It does not matter. We are talking about what kind of umbrella you
would use if it rained monkeys.

Whether a usenet company terminated a subscription or not, it does not
prevent anyone from taking usenet content posted under an anonymous
usenet name, and using it on their own website.

In practical terms there is just not a case worthwhile to persue. The
inability to prove who specifically originated the content makes it
impossible to try. Not to mention the difficulty in attributing a
value to this information when combined with numerous other
information sources.

"No your Honor, you are not being punk'd. I really want to sue someone
for taking my recipe for turkey fritters and putting it on their
website."

Now, we can move on to more important matters like how many angels can
fit on the head of a pin.


On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:29:09 -0000, Janet wrote:
 
On Feb 21, 4:07?pm, Sqwertz wrote:

You're a liar sw. You know you read the entire post.

You're correct in one thing, you have come back and replied just like
some usenet genuine kook.

Did you "tell me off" better this time? What an idiot you are!
 
Back
Top