GfisAnying
New member
Is Mickey Rourke worth the hype?
The Wrestler takes a snapshot of a pro-wrestler in the twilight of his career. His body is stuffed, he can't pay the rent, his only family is an estranged daughter who hates him.
The main comparisons would be with Stallone's recent Rocky Balboa. A broken athlete, a 1 night comeback, problems with the love life. The movies stack alongside each other nicely - I wouldn't nominate The Wrestler for anything other than Mickey Rourke's performance, but is it truly oscar-worthy?
I will say that Rourke IS totally convincing. And perhaps that's all that's needed. It's not one of the great performances but certainly as memorable as Whitaker's Idi Amin but I'll leave the predictions until I've seen Penn (Milk) and Langella (Frost/Nixon) shake their thang.
As far as the movie goes, if you don't like violence then you might find it hard going. There's some nasty nasty scenes which far from being exploitive, truly illustrate the nature of the beast. Wrestling is tough stuff.
The Wrestler takes a snapshot of a pro-wrestler in the twilight of his career. His body is stuffed, he can't pay the rent, his only family is an estranged daughter who hates him.
The main comparisons would be with Stallone's recent Rocky Balboa. A broken athlete, a 1 night comeback, problems with the love life. The movies stack alongside each other nicely - I wouldn't nominate The Wrestler for anything other than Mickey Rourke's performance, but is it truly oscar-worthy?
I will say that Rourke IS totally convincing. And perhaps that's all that's needed. It's not one of the great performances but certainly as memorable as Whitaker's Idi Amin but I'll leave the predictions until I've seen Penn (Milk) and Langella (Frost/Nixon) shake their thang.
As far as the movie goes, if you don't like violence then you might find it hard going. There's some nasty nasty scenes which far from being exploitive, truly illustrate the nature of the beast. Wrestling is tough stuff.