I am trying to find a term which suits this, I initially thought allusion, but it is not really appropriate to what I mean after some research (definitions of allusion refer to it more as a brief mention). I don't think I mean appropriation either.
The type of referencing I mean, is for example when an artist consciously paints using another artists unique style of painting. Or creates an original work that contains a particular pose, or setup from another painting. Or translates a work of art into their own style, or another medium. Not in a way that is fraudulent, or intending to deceive, or trying to hide the reference. Examples of what I mean would be Yinka Shonibare's work, referencing Fragonard's the swing. The Chapman brothers altering Goya prints (maybe). Work like that. Where the referencing is an integral part of the new works meaning.
Thanks in advance for any answers.
Thanks 'inclaireseyes' that has clarified it for me. it's the best answer for me. I have always thought of appropriation only really in the context that text mentions of being about ideas of authorship, etc. When what I was looking for, bit didn't really know still fell under the umbrella of appropriation, was when the point of the borrowing, is about engaging in a dialogue with the particular work borrowed from, and within the greater 'conversation' of art history. Thanks.
The type of referencing I mean, is for example when an artist consciously paints using another artists unique style of painting. Or creates an original work that contains a particular pose, or setup from another painting. Or translates a work of art into their own style, or another medium. Not in a way that is fraudulent, or intending to deceive, or trying to hide the reference. Examples of what I mean would be Yinka Shonibare's work, referencing Fragonard's the swing. The Chapman brothers altering Goya prints (maybe). Work like that. Where the referencing is an integral part of the new works meaning.
Thanks in advance for any answers.
Thanks 'inclaireseyes' that has clarified it for me. it's the best answer for me. I have always thought of appropriation only really in the context that text mentions of being about ideas of authorship, etc. When what I was looking for, bit didn't really know still fell under the umbrella of appropriation, was when the point of the borrowing, is about engaging in a dialogue with the particular work borrowed from, and within the greater 'conversation' of art history. Thanks.