The Ultimate Hipster Playlist / Good Albums that Suck Because You Exist

D

Deme

New member
Exactly right. It's hardly arrogant to question the idea that sexuality has to be the simplistic dichotomy that Western culture conditions us to. Society likes to create stark black and white choices for the sake of ease; there's nothing that is universally True about that.

Morrissey obviously has elements to his style that can be interpreted as pretentious, but questioning pat labels is really not one of them.
 
I hope you put Gulag Orkestar in this list.

Watching a bunch of hipsters suddenly claiming to like eastern European folk music is one of the funniest things i've seen in years.
 
maybe that was it

its very subjectivity made readers want the album


try to explain to someone who couldn't 'be there' but who loved the overall scene
just how FLAT OUT AWESOME a Pink Floyd concert was without getting subjective


yeah
good luck with that

:rofl:
 
While others may simply be confused about their sexuality, I think that Morrissey makes a conscious effort not to conform to any sexual standarRAB. He's just that much of a prick.
 
Wow. Someone actually articulated themselves.

Let it be known that this isn't a senseless Pitchfork bashing. Although Pitchfork is one of the largest perpetrators of asinine musical taste (and prejudice), I'm trying to point out that it's not just them. At least half of the albums I'm gonna rail against came out before PF even existed. And most of these are NOT "diamonRAB in the rough" and certainly Interpol could never qualify as such to begin with.

And actually, I was trying to make a thread that mocked the entire idea of being a hipster. The entire point of this thread is that it's not a great idea to pigeonhole your musical tastes by a collective consciousness. Just wait for later album choices...they might surprise you.

But there will be blood. And soon.
 
Yeah, theres a few banRAB/albums they do that to, and its really annoying. The Cure, The Beach Boys' "Smile" album, they HATE Deerhunter-even insulting them in their reviews-even Flourescent Grey! That EP isn't even long winded or spaced out like cryptograms!
 
415943e4cb399-29-1.jpg

I'd like to preface this by saying that although this list is technically my "opinion," my convictions are such that this list is nothing short of concrete FACT. Do not come here and bitch at me how good these albums are. This thread bears no regard to whether these albums are actually "good" or not. Also: your mother is a whore.

That being said, I suppose I should explain how this perverse idea of mine came into existence...

I've been wanting to do this for a while...a very long while. I've noticed how people will form an opinion about an album when a) they've heard the album a maximum of one time before they formulate an opinion about it or b) take no notice of the album as anything spectacular until they've cottoned onto everyone else's opinions. My perception of a piece of music has been distorted so strongly before I listen to it that I can seldom tell whether I actually like it or not. I've been trying to reprise this terrible habit of late, but it's a laborious process and requires a solid surface to bash my head on before I can squeeze out an opinion. But at least I'm trying.

There are some people who do not try. There are some people who cast aspersions on an album before they actually listen to it. There are some people who actually herald albums as "the greatest album of all time" before they've heard a single fucking note of it. These...are hipsters. These are the people that take the sparse fecal droppings which fall from the flabby ass-cheeks of music critics as gold. These are the people that have subscriptions to NME, Pitchfork, Kerrang!, rabroad, etc...and actually read them. Well, not read. But at least skim -- to find out which albums they should buy and which ones they should troll music forums about.

These people deserve to die. Well, not die. But sit in a cage for twenty-four hours a day listening to the trashy Streets album they bought thinking that the critics were right.

There are many, many people in the world that are hipsters. And some don't even know it. For most part, they're normal, just like you and me (okay, not me): they go to work/school for forty hours a week, party on weekenRAB and occasionally get laid. Between the times which they've got headphones on, it's hard to tell them apart from the rest of the world. But come those few hours a day in which they glory in the shit that's been casually dripping through their speakers, they are a different being entirely. And there's ways of telling:
  • Do you have less muscle mass than a limp fish?
  • Do your clothes frequently ride up your legs and torso?
  • Do you have oversized glasses (with enormous lenses and thick rims)?
  • Do you own a pair of Converse All-Stars or similar model?
  • Girls: do you wear less makeup than your boyfrienRAB?
  • Is your wardrobe split into ironic t-shirts and super-tight jeans?
If so, you might be a hipster! Congratulations!

Now, those might apply for situations in real life, but what's the best possible way of diagnosis via Last.FM? Specifically, these: a list of ten albums a hipster wouldn't get caught missing -- the ultimate hipster playlist, if you will. All in good time.
 
I have no idea what the reaction of pitchfork readers was to that review. I wasn't reading pitchfork in 1999. Were you?

Also it's not the only Pink Floyd album they ever reviewed. See? Though maybe it was the first.
 
What is the 3rd gender? A bisexual?

And yet a fourth gender? Intersexuality, i presume?

And i thought there were getting to be too many choices at the grocery store...
 
Back
Top