The President sure got Obama's camp fired up with his appeasement speech in...

  • Thread starter Thread starter TUT
  • Start date Start date
T

TUT

Guest
...Jerusalem. Is Obama feeling guilty I mean his name wasn't even mentioned and his people are blasting Bush big time for the speech, which I thought was pretty direct and to the point, not to mention the truth. He was comparing the appeasement of Hitler in the 1930's and the people in congress that were for it (isolationists) to the people in congress today that are isolationist appeasers also. They want to talk directly with the state sponsors of terrorism. All they would do is take that as a sign of weakness. As though they could ever talk them out of being evil. So my question is, why did Obama and Co. automatically think that the President was talking about him? Doesn't that seem strange to you?
Check out DF's answer. Here we have the "typical" Obama disciple displaying her super high IQ once again.
williebonkazz, the "New Hitler's" that your god Obama wants to appease are Amadenijad, Chavez, Bin Laden and Kim, just to name a few. BTW, I know more about history than you obviously even do about current events that are going on all around you.
4ver-asking, I think you are 100% correct about your prediction. The gloves are fixin' to come off and I think it is going to be a quick KO of Obama by John McCain with the help of the President.
 
Nothing strange about it. Obama rests his candidacy, in large part, on his oposition to the Iraq war, and part of the rationale is that we should have used diplomacy - which, afterall, had only been given 11 years to work - instead. Similarly, he offers engagement with Iran, Syria and so forth as a means to resolve Iraq. He's an apeaser. It's his whole foriegn-policy platform. An attack on apeasement is an attack on Obama.
 
Sorry dear But to many presidents talk to the enemy to stop things like war. You know JFK, Nixon and Reagan.
 
Back
Top