...atheists in Y!A? I have read hundreds of answers on the origin of life and many atheists still insisted to use Urey-Miller experiment in their arguments. Several atheists (and evolutionists) who realized the shortcoming in this experiment still stated that this experiment actually prove something about the origin of life. Primordial atmosphere that Miller tried to duplicate the experiment does not match reality. In the 1980s, scientists agreed that nitrogen and carbon gases should dioksidalah used in the artificial environment instead of methane and ammonia.
American scientists JP Ferris and CT Chen repeated Miller's experiment using atmospheric environment that contains carbon dioxide, hydrogen, nitrogen, and water vapor, and they are unable to obtain even a single amino acid molecule . (JP Ferris, CT Chen, "Photochemistry of Methane, Nitrogen, and Water Mixture As a Model for the Atmosphere of the Primitive Earth, "Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 97:11, 1975, p. 2964.)
For atheists and evolutionists, why are you still using this experiment but never mentioned about the repeat of this experiment?
American scientists JP Ferris and CT Chen repeated Miller's experiment using atmospheric environment that contains carbon dioxide, hydrogen, nitrogen, and water vapor, and they are unable to obtain even a single amino acid molecule . (JP Ferris, CT Chen, "Photochemistry of Methane, Nitrogen, and Water Mixture As a Model for the Atmosphere of the Primitive Earth, "Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 97:11, 1975, p. 2964.)
For atheists and evolutionists, why are you still using this experiment but never mentioned about the repeat of this experiment?