I'm with you on this one Hot Pepper. It was really baffling coming out of the cinema because I wasn't quite sure what I had seen. Was this really Hitchhikers Guide?
I know I shouldn't expect a remake but I at least expected a version of the books I read, what's the point in making an adaption if you're not going to adapt the frickin' story?
I thought the look of the movie was really good, Marvin looked cool (although Rickman's voice just didn't do it for me at all). I thought Freeman was a good Arthur, Ford should have been odder, Zaphod should have had his second head visible (where did his 3rd arm dissapear to when he need to manually control the Heart Of Gold?), Zooey whatever should have spoken rather than mumbled her lines!
Fry was great as the guide, the animations were ok but when you compare them to the hand drawn animation of the tv series it leave them looking cheap (and considering the tv series is 24 years old that's not a good thing)
Kumana whatever was a pointless cameo part for Mr Malkovich which lead nowhere and was just bloody awful really.
Plenty of plot holes too.
The Vogon planet I did enjoy (kind of), they looked great, they moved and we animated well and the planet and all it's parts looked stunning.
I don't care if they say Adams wrote the new bits, whether he wrote them or not they were a bloody awful, you can't justify rubbish by saying the original author wrote it. The Red Dwarf book "The Last Human" was written by one of the creators of the show but it's terrible!
I really think they waited for Adams to die on this one as this film has been in "development" for nearly 20 years and in all that time Adams could not get it made, I think the changes were what the studio wanted and now he's dead and can no longer (maybe he did, maybe not) argue his point and Disney get full reign of what they want. (one of the parts being that pointless love story... just because it's a film it doesn't mean you need a love story).
I keep reading reviews where they say that "the movie captures the spirit of Douglas Adams perfectly" Rubbish! What made the books and radio show so popular was the quirkiness and humour of which this film threw out.
What happened to the bulldozer scene where Proctor says the plans for the bypass were on display at the council building? Arthur says he found the plans in a dark cellar in a disused toilet inside a locked filing cabinet with a sign on it saying "beware of the leopard".... the movie version of which goes something like this:
Proctor: "They were on display"
Arthur "I found them in the cellar" (or worRAB to that effect)
Where's the humour gone? What's the point of cutting it all down to one line since they cut most of everything else thay may as well have taken this out of the movie altogeher.
Anyway, funny in places, ok acting, nice effects.... not "THE" hichikers guide but rather "A" hitchikers guide that pales in comparision to a 24 year old cheap and cheerful T.V. series... it's a real shame.
P.S. I remember when the earth blew up and this 8 year old kid two rows in front just said "What!?! Is that it?" heh heh... took me two hours to ask myself that question.