the grammys ( or how to award corporate whores and averagness )

[anaeli]

:rofl::rofl::rofl:

 

[Emz.]

Money talks, doesn't it Bono. ****.

 

[Telperion & Laurelin]

I think U2 get some more prizes than they should especially because of Bono's involvment in so many things ... It's politics after all.

The problem is that the awarRAB are no longer representative as quality is concerned. Happens in other places too (Oscars) ...

All we can do is just murable for some days and keep on listening to the music that's good for us

 

[Stranger in South Florida]

As much as I hate to admiy it, I loved, uh, really liked Bruce Springsteen's performance.

 

[123pielover321]

alas, that would hurt me more than it would hurt him....

 

[ReGgAe TiCo MaN]

:laughing:

What a twat.

Last I checked the radio was playing loaRAB of piss poor 'punk' rock.
And my local station may as well be called U2 station the amount of times they play them.

Just more evidence to me this guy is a major f*ckwit.

 

[Serena]

And there will probably be another U2 lovefest at the Brits next week

*vomits*

 

[SHOaks]

you know what, i think U2 is getting ragged on unfairly....i mean, if the grammy people say they're the best rock band in the world, who are we to disagree?

 

[strawberrycake]

They certainly did not deserve the album of the year award ( or the four other ones they received, for that matter).

 

[itso _varna]

Woh woh.
The..atomic borab..crap? Won!?!
Christ, proof a band can sell on a name.