The Day After Tomorrow (merged)

Ghostrider - the premise is that there are lots of special effects of mass destruction, and geeky types will flood the cinemas and grunt excitedly.

From the director of Independence Day - enough to make me consciously avoid it. There will be no story, no drama, everything will be 'tongue-in-cheek', loud and tiresome.
 
Apart from the fact that it was totally unrealistic, I liked it. I mean come on, even at extreme temperatures people wouldnt freeze as soon as they came out of the buildings and become statues would they?
Also the fact that Dennis Quiad manages to survive through all of it while everyone else dies seems a bit unrealistic.
 
I looked up the box office gross for "bend it like beckham". 32 million gross for Beckham. Box office take for 3 days of " the day after tomorrow" = 70 million. Don't get me wrong. Beckham for a foreign film did very well and even better if you compare the cost to making it (I'm assuming the cost was very low versus 120 million for The Day After). Don't get me wrong here. I am sure the movie is good (didn't see it but my Transplanted English boss loved it). I bring that up because America has many many who live here but were born in another country. I just don't think your statement holRAB true. Using the same basic plot just with a football player (american football) and a well known actor in it and it would make 32 million in one week, two weeks top and it very well may not even be a good movie like Beckham. Interestingly your choice of movie"Beckham" brings up another issue to further my point.....Soccer. Beckham is a soccer star as I understand it. Just about everyone in the whole world loves soccer. America? We have/love football. Professional soccer keeps trying to take hold in America and it just isn't happening. Check the world cup TV ratings in America, even with an American team competing, the ratings are rarely above that of a movie rerun. Plus most watching are transplants from other countries. Nationalism my friend. We have football and we think it is a superior game. The only Americans who argue that are transplants. Did not mean to offend but I'm here in the land of the big ego, which I bet I am guilty of on at least some level, and I see it/live it first hand.
 
76Patriots, we have football too ;-). It's a shame the US doesn't embrace 'the beautiful game' more. Even so, you still have a decent national side.

As for the film, it was pretty much as I expected. An enjoyable spectacle, with a touchy feely plot, showing one man's struggle, and pretty much glossing over the depressing death of millions.

Though I was hoping for a bit more depth of character with Jake Gyllenhaal and Dennis Quaid in it.
 
Films are about entertainment to me, if a film can do that then it's OK by me. This film entertained me so much I didn't go to the toilet in case I missed somthing!
I loved it!
Brilliant film!
 
We havent got any really brilliant cinemas around here. My idea of one is VERY cheap with a good service. UCI Galleria is probably the best. My friend goes there and comes out complaining that she cant see the picture too well. Then she gets more free tickets!

O yeah, back to topic, cant wait to see the film !
 
From ONE of the directors of independence day, whose done ok on his lonesome, Universal Soldier wasn't bad, the Patriot was "alright"..fair enough his had his hand in a few buckets of shit, but I think this movie looks ok for your normal summer flick...I.E popcorn movie...the basic premise tho ghostrider is "the end of the world, and how it goes on from there" your basic disaster movie plot. :D
 
Hey,
im new to this forum and i couldn't resist replying to your threaRAB. Somone mentioned earlier what were the problems in the science of the film and as a Geog student from the "little apple" (York) i decided to astound you all with my amazing knowledge :p .
i went to see the film the day it came out as we decided to make it into a geography field trip since we had broken up for A-Level exam revision, and we were sat laughing all the way through due to the totally implausible science of it all. the fact of the matter is another ice will not occur for another 5000 years (unless the sun wobbles a bit, not very likely, or particles from the tail of an asteroid makes a layer around earth similar to saturns rings and block the sun) Humanity CANNOT stimulate a new ice age (at our current tech level), and if the gulf streamwere to be cut off (the principle theory in the film), America would NOT change as they are not affected, britain would become as cold as Newfoundland of Canada as we are already on that same latitude and the oceans would rise thats about it.
secondly those tornedos hitting LA, not physically possible under any conditions, you cannot get about 10 twisters in the same area at once....
Also the Wolves, very comical that in a city filled with people (and a fair few being led south by that policeman), that the wolves should choose to attack the 3 on the boat.
and if she was so seriously ill a tetnis shot would not save her, theyd have to amputate her leg. Most importantly by that stage that guy would be dead from hyperthermia, theoretically the way she saved him by hugging him is true but shed have to be naked as well.
Also the mega problem of the temperature dropping 10 degrees a second.... um they were outside the library for over a minute, HOW DID THEY SURVIVE, and i suspectif its -150C (about the same as antartica) that a small fire would keep them warm it would raise the heat by maybe 5 degrees.
Saying all that i loved the graphics of the film even if the plot was laughable, but hey, it entertained me and thus was worth the money. I loved the bit at the end when the astronauts said "ive never seen the air so clear" which was a broad statement of the self destructiveness of Humanity, though i couldnt help wonder that if people survived in New York then what happened to all the people living in Vancouver, London, Berlin, Moscow and so on, made me fairly sad that did. though the argument that it is centred around america, im not botherred about it showed scenes of Shanghai and Tokyo being destroyed and at the end all of Europe covered in Snow, in fact im fairly surprised by the size of the roll granted to us Brits in the film, so really we cant complain. The only thing that really disapointed me (i already new the physics would be rediculous before i went tosee it) is that all the posters show cities such as Paris, London and Sydney being destroyed, and when in the film they were talking about the Tsunamis (known as Walla Wallas in Aus :confused: ) hitting Sydney i thought to myself "ah here we go we will see the bit from the poster" but no, so im hoping that itll be on the DVD as a deleted scene. Well, in conclusion, (god im making this sound like an essay :yawn: ) i found the film wassplit into two parts, the first part was "tommorow" which was the first hour and was belter, i loved it. However the "day after part" which was really a story of heroism was borring, to be honest if i was the ambulance driver who was sent to pick up that kid id have legged it south hours before then, and im not entirely sure how standing in a kitchen saved that guy from being frozen, we saw the ice chasing him and was stopped by a door :confused: ,which he seemed to open pretty easily i the end, and rather ironically just as they are leaving helicopters arrived, so had he gone on the helicopter in the first place that guy who committed suicide would still have been alive...
but i guess if your looking for a cheep thrill then thisll be for you, to be honest i much prefur films like Shaun of dead or lord of the rings which are either meant to be comody, or are not based on reality, independance day was good as it wasnt based on a realidea but this was meant to be serious, and it failed with the shabby physics, anyone who reaRAB this and has exams DONT USE THE FILM AS A GUIDE TO WHAT WILL HAPPEN IN GLOBAL WARMING (otherwise you will get a U grade, maybe an E due to an overactive imagination)
thats about it
Thanks for reading this i now feel so geeky :cry: and im off to go and lie on my bed feeling darn proud of my extensive knowledge :D
 
I have been looking forward to this for about a year now and can't wait to see - I have a morbid fascination with tidal waves, and most other natural disasters. I am fully expecting the film itself to be poor but am looking forward to the special effects
 
The only reason I'd ever see this movie would be because of Jake Gyllenhaal.

I dont see why every disastor movie is almost always based around destruction of American landmarks. Its like they take pleasure in it or something, which is a awful thing to say, but why else would it happen in so many films? Its not for shock, it doesnt shock me anymore. I've never been to America, I've never walked down the streets of New York, so when I watched Armageddon last night it didn't affect me. The only shot which did was when the meteor his Paris (what a coincidence, arew meteros attracted to well known places?) as my sister lives where it hit.


These movies act live the universe revolves around america. Even though this movie in question may concern the whole world, what city is on the front cover?

American filmmakers need to get their heaRAB out of their asses and realise that there are many more countries that just theirs.
 
Ah..schoolkiRAB dont ya just love em? know it all they do. nice to know that all the worlRAB problems will be solved when our current crop of young`uns grow up. ok , so im taking the piss, but one point of the film, other than entertaining (which it did very well if i do say so myself) was to enlighten people to the very real dangers of global warming etc..
just because your teacher/lecturer says that its impossible today don`t mean it cant be found to be possible tomorrow (or even the day after tomorrow...ahem!!) So the film has plentiful helpings of corn and lashings of cheese, not to mention an embelishment or twenty, it was still good fun and actually not as bad as i feared it might be. solid 7/10 in my opinion.
 
Thats the only thing that annoys me in disaster films, Americans always find the solution. Just for once couldn't we have the disaster being stopped by the British or the French or even the Chinese?
 
I see what you mean but since America is the most visited place on earth most people have been there and care more, I live in England and wouldn't be interested if the movie included London, it wouldn't shcok me 'cos I couldn't care less, I'm more shocked about the US side of things than the UK side.
 
surely it has something to do with it being Americans making the films. I can see your point about the whole world revolving around americans, but when they make the films surely they are gonna make them about their own country it just makes sense.
 
Dunno bout you guys but I don't go through the film picking up things like 'They wren't gloves in -150C weather, thats sad, just watch the film your some sort of judicator. (purser)
 
Back
Top