M
mover
Guest
Of course.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
J
Jimeigh
Guest
is it wrong to conflate botany with fiction?
O
OMNI-MAN
Guest
im getting tired of the word conflate
J
john law
Guest
yes, blacks are oppressed
J
Jimeigh
Guest
is it wrong to get tired of the word conflate?
T
TheRemains
Guest
Is it wrong that Jimeigh isn't on your ignore list?
O
OMNI-MAN
Guest
not in detroit
7
7960
Guest
so now, not only are you a racist if you agree with Rand, but you don't have a soul.
wtf.
fact is, before civil rights legislation, change had already happened and was continuing to happen. if his "pure philosophy" couldn't work, what do you say to the fact that it had already worked?
wtf.
fact is, before civil rights legislation, change had already happened and was continuing to happen. if his "pure philosophy" couldn't work, what do you say to the fact that it had already worked?
O
OMNI-MAN
Guest
no
L
LOL I LIKE COCKS
Guest
Is it wrong to conflate the prefix com- ("con-") with the word flare ("flate")?
J
Jimeigh
Guest
hey, dumbshit, if i do recall there's a certain list of people who ought to be ignored, and which of ours names was on it? that's right. so fuck yaself, pinko.
T
TheRemains
Guest
anarcho-socialists? are you stupid?
this thread is obviously about rand paul you dumbfuck. he is not a collectivist
this thread is obviously about rand paul you dumbfuck. he is not a collectivist
S
Surefire
Guest
Yes! However, obfuscating the difference between a conflation of botany and fiction with an abstract example is fairly obtuse for a person with your analytical ability.
L
LOL I LIKE COCKS
Guest
You're the one that said anarcho-capitalism and libertarianism are the same thing.
You were wrong.
Deal with it.
You were wrong.
Deal with it.
L
Lukkie
Guest
Extremism is a fallacious anti-concept.
B
Braddlac
Guest
this.
the beautiful part about libertarianism (certain brands) is that it does a good job at not being too philisophical. The problem is that libertarianism, quite differently than other political philosophies, distinguishes between the federal government, and smaller local governments. The entire perogative of the Rand Paul type libertarian is to minimize the federal government (ie. be pure and philisophical at the federal level) and let smaller governments be more "practical." The idea is that smaller more intimate governments have more direct knowledge about how to solve problems pertaining to peoples lives, and that smaller governments allow for greater direct representation of the people. I wish this point would be made more often. There is a lot of practicality in Jeffersonian libertarianism, and it's not all airy philosophy.
So, for instance, speed limit laws are in fact a limit on natural rights (you have the natural right to speed, in the anarcho-libertarian sense of natural rights, as long as you dont kill anyone), and so the federal government does not enforce speed limits. However, smaller governments are allowed to infringe on certain rights. Similar things can be done with private businesses in communities, and it would not have the side effect of a huge bloated beurocratic federal government which believes it has the power to cure everything by deficit spending.
the beautiful part about libertarianism (certain brands) is that it does a good job at not being too philisophical. The problem is that libertarianism, quite differently than other political philosophies, distinguishes between the federal government, and smaller local governments. The entire perogative of the Rand Paul type libertarian is to minimize the federal government (ie. be pure and philisophical at the federal level) and let smaller governments be more "practical." The idea is that smaller more intimate governments have more direct knowledge about how to solve problems pertaining to peoples lives, and that smaller governments allow for greater direct representation of the people. I wish this point would be made more often. There is a lot of practicality in Jeffersonian libertarianism, and it's not all airy philosophy.
So, for instance, speed limit laws are in fact a limit on natural rights (you have the natural right to speed, in the anarcho-libertarian sense of natural rights, as long as you dont kill anyone), and so the federal government does not enforce speed limits. However, smaller governments are allowed to infringe on certain rights. Similar things can be done with private businesses in communities, and it would not have the side effect of a huge bloated beurocratic federal government which believes it has the power to cure everything by deficit spending.
B
BadASSMan
Guest
Rand Paul is going to repeal the Civil Right Act, and then immediately hang a "no blacks" sign on his office door.