The D.S. Indiana Jones movie story.........

Unknown

New member
I have just read the story on rabroad saying that internet reviews have said the new movie is a load of rubbish........'panned by internet critics' ....may i say this story is a load of rubbish? Its quoting a almost anonymous internet poster on website 'aintitcool'. So infact it was 'panned by one anonymous person who may or may not have seen the film who posted a message in a forum' When i visited this site, an official 'aintitcool' reviewer posted a very positive review.

D.S. really really need to start looking into stories a bit more.........
 
It's been slated by a few who have already seen it - it's also been praised by a few.

I'm dreading it to be honest, I couldn't stand Last Crusade so I hope this one is better than that!
 
George Lucas has alreadly underplayed expectation by saying:



He knows internet reaction to the Star Wars prequels was muted at best and hostile at worst so he's preparing for the Indiana Jones backlash.

I'm not sure casting Shia Labeouf as the main suppporting character was such a good idea, I think he can be quite an annoying actor, but like everyone else I haven't seen the film so let's wait and see. ;)
 
Yeah... The main review (as in by a known person, rather than an anonymous poster) on AICN is really very positive.

Is it me, or are RAB headlines getting increasingly misleading?
 
To be fair to RAB I've read a few poor reviews in the papers as well - I don't care. I'm the BIGGEST Indy/Harrison Ford fan - probably EVER - and I've had my tickets booked from the second they were available (well, I think so anyway). I'm just going to enjoy the film for what it is, an adventure
 
Under USA law in most states film companies are not allowed to sell a movie to cinemas without showing it to them first. The cinema chain screenings are where the reviews are coming from.
 
I think this film will be lots of fun. I am the BIGGEST Indiana Jones fan, and absolutely 'get' what Lucas, Spielberg and Ford wanted to protray in terms of the 30's matinee serial flick feel of the original three (I even love Temple of Doom)

I read that George Lucas has had the Crystal Skull as a plot device on the backburner for many years, and that the 50's setting and older, gruffer Indy character lend themselves perfectly to the 50's B-movie feel

I am going to go into this film with a different anticipation than the Star Wars prequels, and try and enjoy it for what it is, two hours of pure popcorn escapism, which even if it is the worst Indy film, will still be better than anything else currently on offer
 
This is the extended bbfc classification consumer advice, which has spoilers in it. (from http://www.pbbfc.co.uk/filmDetail.asp?filmID=931 )

'Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull' is the fourth instalment in the popular series. It shows the archeologist-adventurer, played by Harrison Ford, race against Russians to seek out mystical crystal skulls that hold the secrets to an ancient civilisation. The film was passed '12A' for moderate action violence and scary scenes. The film also contains mild language, some focus on weapons and potentially dangerous imitable behaviour.

There are two scary sequences in particular that were felt to be too prolonged and intense to be acceptable at anything below '12A' levels. The first sees a Russian soldier consumed by a swarm of large ants who cover him from head to toe and then drag him underground into their nest. The second sees an army scientist consumed by flames that begin in her eyes sockets and quickly grow to take over her entire body. There are some further scary scenes set in burial chambers, with sight of mummified remains, and a scene of threat in which a character trapped in quicksand is rescued by grasping onto a snake.

There are several scenes involving action violence as Indy battles with the Russian soldiers, with a number of heavy blows being exchanged - one character is seen with a bloody mouth after being punched. Furthermore, the character of Mutt, a 1950s-style Teddy Boy, carries with him a weapon - a flick-knife - which is focussed upon throughout the film although it is never seen being used to inflict injury.

One scene sees Jones escape the effects of a nuclear blast at a test site by hiding in a disused 1950s fridge. The potential for dangerous imitability is limited by another character later warning Jones about the dangers of hiding in such a place. Mild language in the film includes uses of 'hell', 'son-of-a-bitch', 'bullshit', 'bloody' and 'shit'.


It gives away what the traditional really gory death at the end is, fair warning.
 
Back
Top