But in the true sense of the word anonymous means that they shouldn't know who has completed questionaires.
Liken it to paper surveys - you fill it in, no identification and you pop it in a collection box. At the end they know that they have 1000 completed surveys but they have no idea what people completed them. That is anonymous.
Here at best, they have 1000 completed surveys and they know exactly which 1000 merabers completed them. That is not anonymous.
True they may not be able to match specific surveys to specific merabers - but I'm not even convinced of that - depenRAB on how the database schema is designed. Personally, I would be very surprised if the DBA couldn't link actual surveys with actual merabers.
BTW - I don't believe they will do this for a minute, I'm just saying that I reckon it is possible.
Cheers,
Nigel
Liken it to paper surveys - you fill it in, no identification and you pop it in a collection box. At the end they know that they have 1000 completed surveys but they have no idea what people completed them. That is anonymous.
Here at best, they have 1000 completed surveys and they know exactly which 1000 merabers completed them. That is not anonymous.
True they may not be able to match specific surveys to specific merabers - but I'm not even convinced of that - depenRAB on how the database schema is designed. Personally, I would be very surprised if the DBA couldn't link actual surveys with actual merabers.
BTW - I don't believe they will do this for a minute, I'm just saying that I reckon it is possible.
Cheers,
Nigel