What is another interesting thing to note in how females are portrayed in various movies is also WHERE the movie is from and how the society/culture has always viewed the role of women itself.
For example, a lot of the strong, female warriors who are also caring mothers/lovers/sisters have long been portrayed in a lot of Asian films (action and drama) long before that "idea" was considered mainstream in America and the West.
For example, view some of Jackie Chan's original Hong Kong movies form the '80s and '90s -- starring alongside Michelle Yeho -- And Michelle is actually the template for Ewyon, Sara Connor, Lara Croft, etc. as not only Jackie's (the male leads) "sidekick", but an independent, fully developed SECONDARY CHARACTER who is vital to the plot and moves it forward on her own accord that intersects with Jackie's character a lot of the time more than just her "tagging along".
Also, look at Luc Besson and La Femme Nikita. She was the original "Alias" before Jennifer Garner was out of basic training
The point I am trying to make here is that what Western (or specfically, U.S.) audiences and society considers "revolutionary" or "mainstream" as far as female roles in movies go... Isn't that revolutionary in the sense that we are finally catching up with the rest of the world as far as equality of the sexes in the cinema is concerned.
----
It is interesting one of you cited "Jerry Maguire" for having strong female characters -- And it does... But it was written by Cameron Crowe (a male) who also did "Almost Famous" which has another empowering female character played by Kate Hudson.
----
One of you also said you like seeing the strong, kick ass female types like Kate Beckinsale in "Underworld" and Uma Thurman as "The Bride"...
And what shouldn't surprise you is that a lot of the movie executives -- Who are young males in their 20s -- Also like this idea... At least on screen.
Here is where the reality of a strong female in real life and the ideal fatasy of a strong female often mark their drastic differences because if you asked these same 20something execs if they'd like a strong, "kick ass" co-worker who is female... They'd say no... Because they are threatened by that sort of competition AND they still want to be "top dog" when it comes to who has the "brains" money and power.
I bring this aspect up because it is influencing a lot of the films that are being released these days, but it's also a false image in every sense of the word.
Here is big secret that relates to this topic and the portrayl of females:
Most males aren't threatened by a smart female, believe it or not (regardless of what I just said). They are more afraid of a smart famale NOT NEEDING a man at all when it comes down to it... But men will never come out and say this because it makes them look "weak" or it is immasculating to them. So how do they respond?
They perpetuate the "ideal" woman being the ditzy, dumb blonde (or bruntte, or red hed) who NEEDS a man to take care of her because she's not so "bright"... But it has nothing to do with intellect. It's really about who/whom needs who more IF the other one is AS capable as the other one.
And you heard it here first from a 100%, heterosexual enlightened male if you're wondering
I love smart women. Bring'em on!