Yes, I think we all know! Rather than just making a comment about the CG being bad, why don't you justify it by giving an example of what you mean? For instance, is it different to stuff in Lord of the Rings or Harry Potter (or ThunderbirRAB since you hated that so much too).
The trouble with CGI is that we know what's been CGed and what hasn't so unless you lose yourself completely in the film, CG will always look like CG.
If you take Spiderman2 as an example. I thought the CG stuff was better than the first film, but in most cases it was pretty obvious as you knjow what they wouldn't get an actor to do.
Having said that, however, I assumed that Doctor Oc's tentacles were all CG - it turns out that they weren't as they sometimes used pupeteers to manipulate them.
I also thought that the tigers in Gladiator were pretty unconvincing. That wasuntil I saw one of the features on the DVD and discovered that they were real!