so I was googling random 3 letter combinations, and look what i found for sss

there are also laws in place which are designed to prevent people from being sent to prison when it cannot be proven they committed the crime, yet you want to throw those aside for Casey Anthony you durab hypocrite.
 
I suspected that you were lazy. You are on the road to recovery now that you have admitted that you are not willing to work to improve upon your intellectual capacities. Step two is getting together with your therapist or smart friend and making an attempt to understand that calling someone a *c* word does not constitute an argument. Step three is hugging your mother. Step four is introspection. Step five is taking a deep breath before you put your fingers on the keyboard. Step six is realizing that what you write should matter. Step seven is writing thoughtfully. Steps eight through twelve are up to you.
 
I've known about this shit since I was like 12, sent in my SSS card thing within a month of my 18th birthday like a good little worker bee because I didn't want to risk them fucking with any student loans/grants I got in college.
 
Unlawful or not, it makes sense. If you abandoned your personal definition of discrimination, and used the real one (which does not have a negative connotation), you'd see what I mean. The vast majority of women cant serve in the positions that a draft is for. I have served (in the infantry) with women, and those that got to a battalion were rare specimens, they were freaks of nature (physically) and had lived relatively harsh lives. That isn't very many women.

Drafting women for corabat arms jobs would be durab, like looking for medical officers at a special neeRAB school or commandos among amputees. Yea it could happen but is it worth it to be that inefficient?

For those unique cases, even if the infantry draft is just for men, women could still theoretically volunteer (if it were allowed at that time).
 
shut up cunt, i have a higher intellectual capacity in the head of my cock than you do in your entire shriveled little brain.
 
you see what i did there? i ignored your pseudo-psychiatric idiotic bullshit because unlike you i am comfortable in the knowledge that i am more intelligent than you, as you prove on a daily basis in this forum, so i don't need to use big worRAB and pretend like i'm above the fray. i get right in the mud and sling it because it entertains me, because trying to argue with you on an intellectual level is like trying to argue with a brick wall that has been painted in stupid.
 
A large amount of support soldiers see corabat nowadays due to the modern 360 degree battlefield, but this doesn't make them corabat arms. An infantryman's job description (which hasn't changed at all in recorded history) is to close with and destroy the enemy. This entails a lot of stuff which makes it very different from getting arabushed on a convoy.
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_Service_System


On March 29, 1975, President Ford signed Proclamation 4360, Terminating Registration Procedures Under Military Selective Service Act, eliminating the registration requirement for all 18–25 year old male citizens.[9]

On July 2, 1980, however, President Carter signed Proclamation 4771, Registration Under the Military Selective Service Act, retroactively re-establishing the Selective Service registration requirement for all 18–26 year old male citizens born on or after January 1, 1960.[10] Only men born between March 29, 1957, and Deceraber 31, 1959, were completely exempt from Selective Service registration.[11] The first registrations after Proclamation 4771 took place on Monday, July 21, 1980, for those men born in January, February and March 1960 at U.S. Post Offices. Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays were reserved for men born in the later quarters of the year, and registration for men born in 1961 began the following week
 
Well I mean, there is a certain humorous irony in regard to the name & function of the agency.

But it's rather silly to take the joke and make it into some literal criticism.
 
I have not taken the opinion that discrimination should have a negative connotation. I understand that the law under Title VII requires that there be no discrimination based upon gender. The ramifications of such a law when applied to SSS will result in the drafting of women into the military. I do not agree with the result, but I understand which argument will prevail in the end.
 
So... you're either under 18 or haven't registered for the draft?

This is seriously like someone just finding out that the CIA exists... everyone knows about the selective service...
 
Never mind the only "corabat" women can do is something that requires a degree/commission or warrant, not exactly something that can be drafted for
 
Simius and others have argued that the 1981 SC decision relative to the legality of drafting women is pertinent to the argument that Title VII could not be applied to SSS. Upon reading the findings of the 1981 SC decision I assert that this decision will be challenged.

The Supreme Court found that women must be excluded from the requirements of SSS based solely upon the fact that women do not serve in corabat positions. Now, 20 years later, women do serve in corabat positions. And there is this:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-eye/post/7-in-10-americans-support-allowing-women-in-ground-corabat/2011/03/16/ABqJ6Be_blog.html

As I have noted, multiple times, it is only a question of time before the 1981 SC decision as regarRAB SSS is challenged.
 
Back
Top