so I just finished watching the next gen console comparison video on gamrtrailers.com

I've seen that video ages ago, its old news and you are wrong.
360 version has better textures and lighting its plain and obvious from the footage.
 
you dont get any sense of Darkness in the PS3 demoed here. It might have been the monitor, but dark just didnt seem well.... dark.
 
yah the 360 looks better at the moment but you have to give sony time. I'm sure Sony will catch up/surpass the 360 within the year.
 
Man, PS3 is WAYY Better....ohh wait...

I mean shit, after watching a 2 or so minute clip, containing ONLY the game MARVEL...WTF, will let me know who has a superior graphics engine.

I mean, they picked such a great game for graphics, and I mean damn, they played ONE PART of a level, obviously the PS3 is better because it is better for Marvel, we won't take into account a game like COD3, which is far worse then Marvel of course, but we can all agree the PS3's graphics are FAR SUPERIOR because we all watched a 2 minute clip with Marvel.....

You have got to be fucking kidding me....




Cliffs: It is Marvel, the game, and played for 2 minutes tops. All I need to know is in a 2 minute time period, and I will NOT play ANY other game then MARVEL, FOR SURE....Resistance? Yeah right, Gears of War? I would never, COD3 on either system, who wants to reenact a war, MARVEL = Judge an entire system on it.


PS to the OP, I was sarcastic in my entire post above this.

I figured I would tell you the sarcasm part because you are obviously dumb enough to tell of superior graphics in a CARTOON style video game.
 
How about this, the lighting, textures, animations, bump mapping, etc. when compared to the Xbox 360 and the PS3 is negligible. If you want to be picky you can say that the 360 seems to have some better lighting advantages in some situations than others do to its wider range of grey scales...however YOU WILL NEVER NOTICE WHEN PLAYING.

If it looks good it looks good, you can nitpick all you want but bottom-line they are so damn close to one another in terms of graphic quality who gives a fuck. However, if there was more drop in framerate in one console to another that would be a bigger problem.

It's like people trying to say Nvidia or ATI graphics are better, again it is so minute...it really comes down to which particular graphics card is better at rendering the polygons not which one has a little fuzz in the corner of the screen no one notices unless you do a 4x zoom in on the corner while the picture is still.

All in all STFU and someone to some real research and tell me which machine has better framerate overall, give me benchmarks not subjective videos.
 
PS3 looks like it has slower framerates than the 360.
Everything seemed a bit smoother in the 360 bits.

Edit: And the Wii looked pitiful compared to the others.
 
Thats exactly the point. 360 came out a year ago. A year ago everyone was saying how there would be no comparison, PS3 would make 360 look like ass. So where is it? Now I understand the learning curve for programming, but the 360's launch titles didnt look like shit (save for Gun which wasnt made for 360) but they sure didnt look like xbox like Resistance does in teh commerical
 
Back
Top