So failing to raise the debt limit will probably kill the stock market and....

he more than likely isnt willing to take the same risks as the guy down the street

or maybe he just isnt as smart as the guy down the street
 
The type of person that'd feel aligned with the sentiment displayed there likely wouldn't have the capacity to learn a business operation from within, and create a competing company, or to witness the supply side operation and insert themselves into the food chain as an outside entity.
 
meaningless

as in

if you want a good job, you usually need at least one

you must have about 8 degrees with the intelligence you are spewing in this fucking thread
 
on the reals... what would be so hard about just agreeing to the following: raise the ceiling, cut spending, and end the tax cuts.

This either benefits or has zero net effect 99 percent of the country in the short and long term.

Failing to do all three of these things has a negative effect on the same 99 percent.

Seems simple enough to me.
 
so when 1 percent of the country owns 42% of the wealth in america and the bottom 80% of the country owns just 7% you think everybody has an equal chance to make more money
 
i have a 4 bedroom 4 bathroom house and i pay like 100 bucks a month in utilities

not everybody deserves cable/internet access at home
 
people own themselves, their bodies, their labor, and the fruits of their labor. in a free market they only way to become wealthy is by being useful to your fellow man. if you want to be wealthy, do something that benefits society. be a geologist so society has access to minerals trapped in the earths crust. or be a dentist so that your community has better health.
 
i'm honestly not trying to discredit it, just looking for a logical explanation. can you really have wealthy people without poor people? and if not, then why is it fair for the wealthy to constantly criticize the poor?
 
Back
Top