Slate a band

Actually Freddie kept that from the public unitl he was diagnosed with AIRAB. He didn't tell the world till about 4 days befor he died.
I can't stand The Band, their music is so drab and boring and the lead singer has this country hill billy accent. But Norah Jones likes them and since she is my future wife I'll tolerate them.:love:
 
you cant preach to me abou that when you replied to my GNR post with such things as "shocking declaration" and "im near tears"
 
those are the wrong adjectives for queen
Freddie mercurys flaraboyant, undulating voice and bryan mays guitar solos are in no way shape or form "boring"! If anything thats what the group is most famous for, being exciting and full of punch. Listen to 'don't stop me now' and say they are boring again. I can understand people not liking them, thats fair, but boring??
 
bit belated, the beatles have influenced so many of todays artists. they were diverse (just listen to revolver then magical mystery tour). "now their ****?" how can a band suddenly become **** after 40+ years as legenRAB? their back catalogue speaks for itself. i respect your opinion on them but consumerists delight? true they were idolised by millions in their day (and still are) but thats only due to their brilliance. oh btw, its not just old people, a lot of younger people and indeed our generation appreciate them as one of the greatest. if in 40 years green day are hailed as an all time great i presume you'll say the same thing about being there at the right time and right place? yeah, im bored. touche.
 
because stone roses released about 3 good songs, not albums. furthermore, you say that white stripes have 4 fantastic albums, they don't hold a candle to the Guns'n'Roses collection. So i think "one good album" is a bit of a shocking declaration.
 
what other guns and roses albums were a huge success? and 3 good songs? what the ****? try a greatest hits packed full of classics. the white stripes have 4 great albums yet they have released nowhere near as many singles as GNR did. and they are a generally more low key than GNR.
 
I really don't like Queen now that you mention it because at one time..I did. BUT, every older lady that I meet says,"Queen's The Absolute Best, Yeah!" And I kind of DISAGREE with that because Queen just appealed to many with their catchy-ass songs "We Will Rock You", "We Are the Champions", and "Under Pressure" feat David Bowie. So in conclusion, I believe that if Queen had not released three of the catchiest, easiest, get stuck way the hell up in your head type of songs, then they would not be where they were today. (But I never said Freddy Murcury is a bad vocalist, because I can't fathom how he can stay in tune on some high notes.)
 
The beatles are sweet,because i have memorys of watching there crazy film yellow submarine when i was little. They basically just had very good, harmonized voices, my favourite song is prob. eleanor rigby. But that's only my opinion
 
no he was actuually taking about queen by referring to them as "the band". be quite perculiar to suddenly the mention the actual band while slating queen.
 
its sarcasm love. English people are famous for it. Your opinion on my music doesn't affect it at all im not inclined to be pissed off unless im faced with just unintelligent, derogatory comments on music, for example MusicKnowItAll or whatever his name is
 
their certainly not my favourite but they've churned out some quality songs and a brilliant greatest hits. plus news of the world is one of my favourite albums.
 
thats like saying "oh if black sabbath didnt release paranoid they'd be nothing". it just isnt true. yeah, they made 3 catcvhy songs- testament to them for doing so. yet they have so many more classics than just those 3.
 
Back
Top