Since its abvious any soldier that shoots as his fellow soldiers is a terrorist, what...

B

Bizzaro- Bama

New member
...about Camp Liberty? BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- The U.S. soldier who fired on fellow troops in Iraq has been identified as Army Sgt. John Russell, and he's been charged with five counts of murder, a military spokesman said Tuesday. Sgt John Russell was on his third tour in Iraq. Russell made a statement to the news men that he was angry Bush said the war would last only 6 to 8 months and here it is over 7 years later and no end in sight. Sgt Russell stated he couldn't take it anymore so he lashed out.

its obvious this guy was full of crap and trying to hide his conservative islam connections, by using Bush as a scape goat! does anyone else besides me think we should stop being so damn PC keep a closer eye on these crazy white radicals?
The paths that brought six men together in a Baghdad military clinic traced across the globe, from South America to rural Missouri, from the islands of Alaska to deepest Antarctica, before intersecting in a tragic shooting spree.

Authorities say Sgt. John M. Russell, who was nearing the end of his third tour in Iraq, was deeply angry at the military when he walked into the combat stress clinic at Camp Liberty on Monday and opened fire.

Two of the men who died devoted their careers to helping men like Russell: soldiers suffering from the stress of combat and repeated deployments
 
What about it? The guy got punished for his crimes. What else do you expect. The Ft. Hood massacre was done by someone who openly had connection to radical islamic groups. He should get punished for his crimes, and if proven in court, for terroristic acts as well as murder.
 
Can you explain something to me? How is the man at Ft. Hood NOT a terrorist? The definition of a terrorist is one who performs acts of intimidation or violence to enstill terror in a group of people.

To back my point up even more, they said on the news yesterday that they found proof in his computer that he was linked to Muslim terrorist groups.

So please, tell me how this man is NOT a terrorist. Thank you!

EDNA: Here are a few more definitions from dictionary.com

Terrorism
1. the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, esp. for political purposes.
2. the state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization.
3. a terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government.

So...EDNA how is he not a terrorist. Thank yo for proving my point right again! :-)
 
There is a big difference between the two cases. Sgt. Russell was on his THIRD tour in Iraq, and Major Islam hadn't even been there ONCE! BTW, I don't recall anyone saying Sgt. Russell was screaming "Allah Akbar!" while he was squeezing 'em off. Yes, some men are going to crack under the pressure of combat. It's happened in every war there ever was. But Major Islam was never IN combat, so he can't use that excuse.
 
According to Betheny's definition every act of violence is consider terrorism.

Actually that is the problem, in US code alone there are over 120 different definitions of terrorism, lets face it, the guy is going to be executed for his crimes, semantics mean nothing now.
 
One small difference in both killings -- "ALLAH AKBAR!"

The FBI has e-mail exchanged b/n Hassan and Al Qaeda.

Thank you, come again.

Edit:
"Someone suffering from stress?"

The guy was never deployed. PTSD? Goes to show the liberal Media will do anything, craft any story or offer any explanation, other than the obvious one to protect their master.
 
Hasan had never been to Iraq or Afghanistan. The closest thing he ever saw to combat was probably driving through Washington, D.C.

"who was nearing the end of his third tour in Iraq"

At least John Russell had some reason to act like he did. Hasan has nothing.
 
Back
Top