Should we believe evloution scientists any more than we should believe climate

Y

Yahoo Questions

New member
change scientists? Sorry typo on evolution
It is the personal motive rather than the science that dictate the scientific findings.
There is controversy that has come to light recently that scientists have falsified evidence about climate change is caused by human activity.
Does this show that the establishment of scientists support theories that want to support by making the evidence point to their prejudices.
If scientist didn't have evolution they would have no where else to go.
It seems like the climate scientists got away with falsifying data unchallenged for years and only until they were asked to expose their finding that some have threatened to destroy their data rather than have it revealed.
 
Yes; although both are sound according to all available data....

I do think climate change is still a relatively new area of study with sometimes conflicting discoveries, many possible interpretations, and it will take time to fully understand the complexity of what is actually happening... however you can't escape the fact that all the data we have shows that global temperatures are on an OVERALL upwards trend and that no scientific models can currently account for this without including human pollution as a contributing factor. No body really denies that the data is accurate; they mainly disagree with the political agenda of 'global government for a global problem' and other left-wing proposed 'solutions' and general exploitation that the data cannot be shown to justify.

Evolution on the other hand is probably the most evidentiary supported scientific theory there is. 150 years after its proposition it has been vindicated in so many different ways that there is no justifiable opposition to it, especially as it does not inform policy on any side of the political spectrum.
 
Back
Top