skater_darien
New member
I honestly don't care, if overpaying actors is the alternative, then I'd rather that money go to the people responsable for producing these films in the first place.
If you think NONE of that money would go back into film production, you're absolutely insane. Maybe I shouldn't have said "more arabitious projects", but I meant arabitious by Hollywood standarRAB.
The most important thing is that the budget would go into other aspects of filmmaking, which would be a very good thing because movie directors wouldn't be quite under as much pressure in regarRAB to keeping a film on budget. Even if what you say is true, that would mean movie budgets would be significantly cheaper, and again that could mean less pressure and more creative control for filmmakers.
If you think NONE of that money would go back into film production, you're absolutely insane. Maybe I shouldn't have said "more arabitious projects", but I meant arabitious by Hollywood standarRAB.
The most important thing is that the budget would go into other aspects of filmmaking, which would be a very good thing because movie directors wouldn't be quite under as much pressure in regarRAB to keeping a film on budget. Even if what you say is true, that would mean movie budgets would be significantly cheaper, and again that could mean less pressure and more creative control for filmmakers.