should i be annoyed by contrarians when it seems like theyre just being...

it happens and guess what you are offsjb...i think it should be deport only the single ones or the ones with mexican wives...IF MARRIED TO AN AMERICAN MORE THAN 5 yrs let them stay.
 
Yes! I mean, No! I mean whatever is most opposite of your point that will annoy you the most!

Actually, as to your specific question, I agree with you. Everyone has been screwed over by someone at some point. No human group can claim the moral high ground, because somewhere in their past, their ancestors did something to someone.

However, as deporting illegal immigrants, I think first you have to stop employers from offering them enticements to cross the border.
 
Yes! I mean, No! I mean whatever is most opposite of your point that will annoy you the most!

Actually, as to your specific question, I agree with you. Everyone has been screwed over by someone at some point. No human group can claim the moral high ground, because somewhere in their past, their ancestors did something to someone.

However, as deporting illegal immigrants, I think first you have to stop employers from offering them enticements to cross the border.
 
...disagreeable & going off topic? example: my position is ALL illegal aliens should be deported. instead of simply saying what they agree or disagree about what i just said. the contrarian will say something like "well, im sure the american indians would have liked to have kept their home."

to me thats veering off topic & its irrelevant to the discussion & anecdotal at best. not just because they disagree with me. if we want to play by those rules then anyone whose ancestors have been screwed by anothers in the past should be entitled to some special treatment because of it. i disagree.

so from your perspective, do they have a valid point or not?
 
Yes! I mean, No! I mean whatever is most opposite of your point that will annoy you the most!

Actually, as to your specific question, I agree with you. Everyone has been screwed over by someone at some point. No human group can claim the moral high ground, because somewhere in their past, their ancestors did something to someone.

However, as deporting illegal immigrants, I think first you have to stop employers from offering them enticements to cross the border.
 
Based on your example you should pay more attention to the contrarians. I understood what you said but look up the word contrarian. What the 'contrarian' did n your example is disagree and tell you why.
 
Yes! I mean, No! I mean whatever is most opposite of your point that will annoy you the most!

Actually, as to your specific question, I agree with you. Everyone has been screwed over by someone at some point. No human group can claim the moral high ground, because somewhere in their past, their ancestors did something to someone.

However, as deporting illegal immigrants, I think first you have to stop employers from offering them enticements to cross the border.
 
Yes! I mean, No! I mean whatever is most opposite of your point that will annoy you the most!

Actually, as to your specific question, I agree with you. Everyone has been screwed over by someone at some point. No human group can claim the moral high ground, because somewhere in their past, their ancestors did something to someone.

However, as deporting illegal immigrants, I think first you have to stop employers from offering them enticements to cross the border.
 
it happens and guess what you are offsjb...i think it should be deport only the single ones or the ones with mexican wives...IF MARRIED TO AN AMERICAN MORE THAN 5 yrs let them stay.
 
Back
Top