Sct

actually, ScT has been doing pretty badly in pretimes lately. SCC's freeleech section is very nice too.

[SITES] [ SCC: 2167, GFT: 892, ScT: 604, HT: 390, TL: 300, SiT: 230, ThB: 157, THS: 149, ScL: 59, TPB: 53, RBy: 51, CT: 40, PTM: 28, TD: 28, AL: 22, BTv: 16, TC: 15, TBy: 12, ACE: 12, TGB: 12, RTT: 9, NT: 9, TCS: 7, PT: 5, DH: 4, ScR: 2, A4N: 2, SFT: 1 ]
 
Sct really is the best. If you have a decent buffer in sct, you will never need another 0day site.

As far as the pretimes go, a few seconds don't harm anyone. Only the ones who sit in their chair all day observing the pretimes, are the ones to care about them. Sct is in the Top 5 for pretimes, so i don't see any good reason to bash.
 
If you're smart and "play the game" right pick and choos what to download you will be fine. I was lucky I got in when they had a huge freeleech and buffered easily
 
tbh home users could just buffer off that sweet ass pack section

my box is only 10mbit up/down and even if i do get on a pack first and max all the way till the end i never get to 1:1 to many gigabit boxes
 
i bet this kid got banned from scc...first bashing its and now scc.
all trackers must tread with respect, but i guess youre 10y old kiddo...

and this stats is taken from p2p tracers: [SITES] [ SCC: 2013, GFT: 816, ScT: 491, HT: 363, TL: 285,SiT: 221, THS: 148,ThB: 147, ScL: 50, RBy: 43, TPB: 42, CT: 38, PTM: 23, TD: 22, AL: 21, TC: 15, TBy: 12, ACE: 12, RTT: 9, TGB: 9, NT: 8,BTv: 7, PT: 5, DH: 4, ScR: 2, A4N: 2, SFT: 1, ]

tracing 2009->
 
SCC may beat ScT in pre-times but i guarantee if 1 person grab from SCC then 30 seconds later he grabs from ScT the ScT will finish first , theres so many boxes there with insane speeds that even if theres only 1 seeder im maxed and then some
 
Albo Da Kid said:
Sct really is the best. If you have a decent buffer in sct, you will never need another 0day site.

As far as the pretimes go, a few seconds don't harm anyone. Only the ones who sit in their chair all day observing the pretimes, are the ones to care about them. Sct is in the Top 5 for pretimes, so i don't see any good reason to bash.
Click to expand...


Totally agree whocares about a few seconds when it comes to pretimes, to be honest i couldnt careless if it was 30mins difference, aslong as the differences arent days who really cares about pretimes.
 
kevinsert can you read English? I guess not. better read it again. Why bring that to here anyway??? ps: better to remove that spoiller.
 
Alright, for those who doesn't wants to read up on the 6 pages.

People here are claiming that ScT, even though having slower pretimes (smaller e-penis) of 30 seconds to a few minutes the torrents retention are usually much longer and speeds are much more faster.

But from my point of view, most people are using OVH 100mbit dedis so there wouldn't really be a difference in speeds.
 
105802 said:
SCC may beat ScT in pre-times but i guarantee if 1 person grab from SCC then 30 seconds later he grabs from ScT the ScT will finish first , theres so many boxes there with insane speeds that even if theres only 1 seeder im maxed and then some
Click to expand...

its the same from SCC
 
sabre said:
actually, ScT has been doing pretty badly in pretimes lately. SCC's freeleech section is very nice too.

[SITES] [ SCC: 2167, GFT: 892, ScT: 604, HT: 390, TL: 300, SiT: 230, ThB: 157, THS: 149, ScL: 59, TPB: 53, RBy: 51, CT: 40, PTM: 28, TD: 28, AL: 22, BTv: 16, TC: 15, TBy: 12, ACE: 12, TGB: 12, RTT: 9, NT: 9, TCS: 7, PT: 5, DH: 4, ScR: 2, A4N: 2, SFT: 1 ]
Click to expand...

What's HT ? url please
 
Back
Top