Scream 4

[oscar b]

I really loved the first 3 and i can't wait for the 4th that is due out in 2010 i always thought there was only meant to be just 3.From what i have read it's going to be set

Spoiler

10 years after scream 3

.

 

[nagina_005]

Here, Here, Here and Here

Not a criticism, just that's it's been discussed to death already lol

 

[//Luseroo.♥$]

It's all a new 'younger' cast this time around with only cameos from the main cast of the first three, they better not be shitty and kill Sidney off and make the trilogy pointless.

 

[semi_sonic18]

I LOVE SCREAM. My favorite movies ever. Although I can't wait for the 4th one, I just hope it doesnt tarnish the trilogy.

 

[Khkjhkj K]

Scream fans would want it to stop at the trilogy

 

[Patricia Seay]

I read that

Spoiler

They are going to kill her off

i don't know if it's true or just a rumor.

 

[Johnny Blaze]

Hopefully it's a stupid rumour.

 

[Eric L]

I am not looking forward to this.

Scream 2 is one of my favourite movies and the Scream Trilogy is probably my joint favourite trilogy ever, along with Back To The Future, if they dare Kill Sidney I'll be deeply disappointed.

Same with Gale or Dewey.

Hope they are just cameos in flashback or through a TV, like interviews or something, rather than in the action and killed.

I still kinda hate that Cotton was killed at the start of 3, totally senseless to kill him imo.

 

[Luchea]

Ah I adored how they killed him off at the start of Scream 3, good opening, it got to Sidney and so on, so it wasn't pointless.

 

[ggm]

Because you have no other choice...

 

[~// @ |2 |) @~]

I agree they shouldn't have killed Cotton off in the third (but then again it was a different writer so it was typical). It still grates on me that they didn't give Kevin Williamson the time he wanted to complete Scream 3 the way he wanted it to go, it damaged the franchise; Scream 3 could have been so much better.

 

[Miss Coffee]

Starting the series over again will make it all fresher.You dont want the same actors to keep going back all the time.

 

[Marke]

maybe this time it might actually be scary

 

[Hondaalldaii!!!]

I'd rather they just left it at 3.

What's the point in making a sequel if you are going to ignore those that appeared before? Its just cashing in on the Scream Name rather than coming up with an original horror. Or a more original anyway.

Its basically just going to be another stalk and slash film like the crap that is released monthly anyway, but with the Scream name dragged into the dirt because of it.

 

[xxforeverrxx]

Ok calm down lol I hear your opinions!

 

[LadySnyper]

Was not suppose to be that scary in the first place, it's horror(thriller) and 'black' comedy.

 

[Gsaba]

Exactly. Some people miss the point about Scream; it's not your run-of-the-mill slasher horror flick, it's intelligent.

 

[CelticDragon]

I loved the Scream movies. Agree Cotton shouldn thave been killed off so early though.

 

[SAD]

Early(I know you mean in the film)? he had a big role in the sequel, glimpsed in the first if I remember right, and had the whole opening to himself and girlfriend, had a good run. I must be in the minority who liked his death in the third.

 

[Via!]

IMO, Cotton was integral to the whole storyline and it was a mistake killing him off. I agree his death in S3 provided the necessary "scare" for that particular movie and it took the movie in the direction it went but I'd have taken it a different way and kept Cotton as a major character. Always the suspect, never the victim lol.