C
cx329
Guest
Tell me how you can possibly debate Darwin's theory of evolution which have been proven over and over again in the fossil records and DNA evidence over a century after his death.
Darwin knew nothing of DNA in his day yet DNA evidence perfectly describes his theory.
And don't even think of jumping on me about evolution being only a theory. In science a theory is a hypothesis that has stood the test of scientific scrutiny. Gravity is a theory. It's the exact mechanisms of a theory that are debatable, not the assertion itself.
Why do so many blindly follow what the church tells them without investigating the facts themselves? After all the church is just an institution which serves it's own agenda. Science by it's own definition strives to disprove itself. That's the scientific method and that what makes it so rock solid.
Darwin knew nothing of DNA in his day yet DNA evidence perfectly describes his theory.
And don't even think of jumping on me about evolution being only a theory. In science a theory is a hypothesis that has stood the test of scientific scrutiny. Gravity is a theory. It's the exact mechanisms of a theory that are debatable, not the assertion itself.
Why do so many blindly follow what the church tells them without investigating the facts themselves? After all the church is just an institution which serves it's own agenda. Science by it's own definition strives to disprove itself. That's the scientific method and that what makes it so rock solid.