I don't get your problem, Tv Controls you. Your account was irrefutably linked to warfront1 and Nuke0063, which were disabled less than a day before the tvcontrolsyou account was created. It's painfully obvious that you had multiple accounts, which is against the rules on basically all trackers.

You even managed to implicate yourself, by saying "Even a 'terrible user' such as myself had over 3 invites". The tvcontrolsyou account never had any invites - however, the original Nuke0063 account did.

Your account was disabled for ratio watch, you tried to get more, we found you and banned you. I don't see why we're at fault here.
 
In addition the second rule you listed is no where to be found on there interview page and I was banned around a year ago so if your reading new rules they didn't apply to me.

http://whatinterviewprep.webs.com/preparefortheinterview.html

That rule about accounts getting linked if multiple accounts are seen logging in from same place has been there for a long time. It's your shortcoming for not reading the Golden rules when you first joined the site.

Also, one question in the interview is whether the interviewee has had an account in the past. And as everyone can guess easily, you must have lied about that.

They then found that about a month afterwards and I went in and they said I was banned for a low ratio. Then they tried pinning me for two accounts lol.
I then cursed out the entire disabled channel if I remember correctly...
Your use of the word 'entire' indicates that you are under the false illusion that the whole world cares about your curses.

whats wrong with my rep points? Im already in at what.cd, have been nearly since the beginning. I dont go there much, use waffles more, but I just think this whole interview thing is a little bit over the top.
How is it hurting anyone? Most sites don't even have such a process and the only way to enter is by getting invited from someone you already know. Something is better than nothing, isn't it?
 
They only want members that can keep a ratio and have audio ripping/encoding knowledge (necessary to upload your own albums without getting them deleted) to get in. I don't see the problem with that. :unsure: You can always get in without taking it if someone invites you anyway.

I understand the logical reasoning, but lets be honest, they are putting alot of stipulations out for someone to join a site to download music illegally. Seems pretty ironic to me.
 
I didn't take the interview... I got invited by the same guy who invited my first account.
He also got banned... All 3 of us (me and my 2 co workers got banned from the site)

It wasn't his ip at all, it was a the work places ip address... He couldn't of had more than 20 minutes of use from that ip address recorded.
I am also sure he has gotten 0 k/b's down or up as .torrent files are disabled.

It wasn't even listed in the rules when I joined about a year ago.
 
I love how everyone is trying to justify them banning for no apparent reason simply because it is their site.

That is a load of bullshit.

The fact is I have more credibility than you whiteboy. I'm sure I am 10x the user you are on any tracker your on.
your measurement of how much you are a better user - it's only yours. and "justify"? i am just explaining. there's no justice in here, if you think that there should be some of it, you're just naive to say at least
 
Back
Top