[email protected]

Tv Controls you said:
As no where in the rules does it state that users are held responsible for other user's actions.
Click to expand...

Sorry if I misread something, but I get that your coworker used the same PC as you and broke What.cd's rules?

If so, those do point out that if you use the same computer to log in, your accounts will be linked, thus affecting the other if one of them misbehaves.
 
anon-sbi said:
Sorry if I misread something, but I get that your coworker used the same PC as you and broke What.cd's rules?

If so, those do point out that if you use the same computer to log in, your accounts will be linked, thus affecting the other if one of them misbehaves.
Click to expand...

As I gather I was linked with my co worker...
Yes we all use a machine at our work place. We didn't download or seed from there ever.
I'm even pretty sure .torrent files are banned on the network there.
We both seeded from different ip's or downloaded (as it seems he never seeded lol)
 
I love how everyone is trying to justify them banning for no apparent reason simply because it is their site.

That is a load of bullshit.

The fact is I have more credibility than you whiteboy. I'm sure I am 10x the user you are on any tracker your on.
 
You're completely responsible for the people you invite. If your invitees are caught cheating or trading/selling invites, not only will they be banned, so will you. Be careful who you invite. Invites are a precious commodity.

I like this part of the rules.
 
I like the rule also as they act as if their invites are something of worth.
Even a "terrible user" such as myself had over 3 invites.

Also, They are negligent to their rule where you are liable for crazed accusations made on complete assumptions.

Or is that covered already in their "golden Gilded Rules"
Access to this website is a privilege, not a right, and it can be taken away from you for any no reason.
Click to expand...
 
cinephilia said:
what about that 'TVCy'? :coffee:
Click to expand...

I put terrible user in quotes as that's what what.cd makes me out to be.

I had invites on my one account (I believe it was named killzone08085) then I got banned for this BS, and made a new account tv controls you.
They then found that about a month afterwards and I went in and they said I was banned for a low ratio. Then they tried pinning me for two accounts lol.
I then cursed out the entire disabled channel if I remember correctly...
 
TVCY:

It was never a wise idea to "supposedly" log in from a public work computer, much less one that another co worker is logging in to from the same place. You should realize from the start that that is an inherently suspicious action in the first place, and you can't in anyway blame the staff for harboring doubts, considering how popular of an "excuse" that is for having dupe accounts.

And why would you, as well as your co worker, decide to log in from public work computers that you will never even download from? Was what.cd so much of a necessity that both of you couldn't even wait until you got home to visit the site? Even if I give you the benefit of the doubt for everything the staff are accusing you of, your actions were such a terrible idea in the first place that, if you got mistakenly banned, you have no one else but yourself to blame for it.

And even if you disagree with everything I say above, there is one clear rule you broke that even you yourself admitted to: you created multiple accounts. No matter how you slice it, no matter how "justified" it may be, you still broke that rule, and the staff have every right to ban you for that. If perhaps after your first ban you calmly negotiated with the staff or posted at FST you may have gotten your issues resolved, but after breaking such a black and white rule there isn't much of a chance.
 
How about this part:
"Do not browse the site using proxies or TOR. The site will automatically alert us."
I'm seeding/leeching from a dedicated server in germany that i also use as a proxy for all my browsing i do from home(in sweden). Will that be a problem?
 
you mean, nothing like this?
"Attempting to find or exploit a bug in the site code is the worst possible offense you can commit. We have automatic systems in place for monitoring these activities, and committing them will result in the banning of you, your inviter, and your inviter's entire invite tree."

Tv Controls you said:
As I gather I was linked with my co worker...
Yes we all use a machine at our work place. We didn't download or seed from there ever.
I'm even pretty sure .torrent files are banned on the network there.
We both seeded from different ip's or downloaded (as it seems he never seeded lol)
Click to expand...
or like this? "Be careful when sharing an IP or a computer with a friend if they have (or have had) an account. From then on your accounts will be inherently linked and if one of you violates the rules, both accounts will be disabled along with any other accounts linked by IP. This rule applies to logging into the site."
 
Kukushka I don't mean to be rude but everything you just typed was complete nonsense, excuss me if I didn't pick up on your sarcastic tone or something.

My whole scenario pertaining to what.cd has absolutely nothing to do with exploiting a bug within what.cd.
In addition the second rule you listed is no where to be found on there interview page and I was banned around a year ago so if your reading new rules they didn't apply to me.

http://whatinterviewprep.webs.com/preparefortheinterview.html
 
Rart said:
TVCY:

It was never a wise idea to "supposedly" log in from a public work computer, much less one that another co worker is logging in to from the same place. You should realize from the start that that is an inherently suspicious action in the first place, and you can't in anyway blame the staff for harboring doubts, considering how popular of an "excuse" that is for having dupe accounts.

And why would you, as well as your co worker, decide to log in from public work computers that you will never even download from? Was what.cd so much of a necessity that both of you couldn't even wait until you got home to visit the site? Even if I give you the benefit of the doubt for everything the staff are accusing you of, your actions were such a terrible idea in the first place that, if you got mistakenly banned, you have no one else but yourself to blame for it.

And even if you disagree with everything I say above, there is one clear rule you broke that even you yourself admitted to: you created multiple accounts. No matter how you slice it, no matter how "justified" it may be, you still broke that rule, and the staff have every right to ban you for that. If perhaps after your first ban you calmly negotiated with the staff or posted at FST you may have gotten your issues resolved, but after breaking such a black and white rule there isn't much of a chance.
Click to expand...

There is no negotiating with the disabled channel staff, they drive you to flip out.
Although I agree it was stupid logging in on the same computer, I shouldn't be banned for another person's actions.

I didn't know of waffles when I was banned, and I was a hardcore audiophile so I didn't have an option.
I found my second account fully justifiable.
 
Tv Controls you said:
In addition the second rule you listed is no where to be found on there interview page and I was banned around a year ago so if your reading new rules they didn't apply to me.
Click to expand...
if it's not written it their rules, it doesn't mean that they won't ban somebody's ass if they'll feel like it. they're kind enough to point to most common occasions in rules but who obliged them to describe all possibilities some of which they may even not be aware of until sh happends. at the end it's their private tracker and they do whatever they want and while they're keeping their tracker alive and well, they have the point of doing it the way it is
 
They only want members that can keep a ratio and have audio ripping/encoding knowledge (necessary to upload your own albums without getting them deleted) to get in. I don't see the problem with that. :unsure: You can always get in without taking it if someone invites you anyway.
 
Back
Top