I'm not suggesting that the spoiler was a good thing, but quite frankly - if you've seen anything else he's done*, you'll know how this works.
(*I'm obviously excluding Swept Away here, as that movie clearly fell through a timehole from another dimension. At least that's the only explanation for it I have.)
What Guy Ritchie has got is a really bad case of George Lucas Syndrome (indeed, he may even have it worse than GL himself!) Having an interesting and complex story is meaningless if you can't actually write the script that makes it work. Lock, Stock almost worked because the one-liners disguised the rest of the terrible writing. But once you've seen that trick, there's no point in remaking the film several times and hoping no-one notices.
I'm not even sure Ritchie is a good director any more (if he ever was!) - there was nothing in this film that had any sort of innovation, or even real style. I was disappointed - and I hardly had high hopes for it to begin with.